Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41577350›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Voices beyond the margins: a protocol for a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis of Indigenous patients' experiences accessing mainstream healthcare services in Canada.

Suha Damag, Emily Villanueva, Nuha Damag, Maureen Plante, Claudia Steinke, Supriya Middha, Richard Oster, Annabelle Chatsis, Oluwaghohunmi Adetunji Awosoga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Suha DamagFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada damags@uleth.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9017-818X
Emily VillanuevaUniversity of Lethbridge Library, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1747-9407
Nuha DamagBusiness School, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
Maureen PlanteFaculty of Education, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Claudia SteinkeFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.
Supriya MiddhaFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3375-0742
Richard OsterDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0657-9263
Annabelle ChatsisDepartment of Indigenous Studies, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.
Oluwaghohunmi Adetunji AwosogaFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFirst Nations, Inuit and Métis Peoples in Canada continue to face significant disparities in healthcare access compared with non-Indigenous populations. Understanding their experiences in accessing healthcare is essential for addressing systemic barriers and promoting equitable, patient-centred care. Although existing studies have identified various barriers and facilitators to accessing healthcare, a lack of synthesised qualitative evidence delves into the intricacies of patients' experiences. This systematic review aims to investigate Indigenous patients' experiences with mainstream Canadian healthcare services and their recommendations for service improvement through a meta-synthesis of qualitative literature. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Meta-aggregation will be used to conduct a systematic review of qualitative studies and qualitative components of mixed-methods studies exploring experiences of Indigenous patients accessing mainstream healthcare services in Canada. Papers published in English will be searched using electronic databases, including MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, Global Health, the Bibliography of Indigenous Peoples in North America and Web of Science. A comprehensive list of non-indexed and grey literature will also be searched to ensure the inclusion of community-based and non-peer-reviewed evidence. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria will be assessed for methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Quality Appraisal Tool. The review will involve the extraction of findings, categorisation into themes and synthesis into broader insights guided by the JBI meta-aggregation approach. An Indigenous advisory committee will guide the process, including interpretation of findings and ensuring alignment with Indigenous health research principles. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this study as it is based on a secondary analysis of publicly available primary studies. The completed review will be published in a peer-reviewed manuscript. Findings will also be shared with relevant Indigenous organisations and community partners through plain-language summaries and community-engaged knowledge-sharing activities. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420250656486.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services, IndigenousIndigenous CanadiansCanadaHumansQualitative ResearchResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicHealth ServicesHealth Services AccessibilityPatient-Centered CareQUALITATIVE RESEARCHVulnerable Populations

Identifiers

PMID41577350
PMCPMC12853470

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.