ArticleBMJ open2026
Voices beyond the margins: a protocol for a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis of Indigenous patients' experiences accessing mainstream healthcare services in Canada.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFirst Nations, Inuit and Métis Peoples in Canada continue to face significant disparities in healthcare access compared with non-Indigenous populations. Understanding their experiences in accessing healthcare is essential for addressing systemic barriers and promoting equitable, patient-centred care. Although existing studies have identified various barriers and facilitators to accessing healthcare, a lack of synthesised qualitative evidence delves into the intricacies of patients' experiences. This systematic review aims to investigate Indigenous patients' experiences with mainstream Canadian healthcare services and their recommendations for service improvement through a meta-synthesis of qualitative literature. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Meta-aggregation will be used to conduct a systematic review of qualitative studies and qualitative components of mixed-methods studies exploring experiences of Indigenous patients accessing mainstream healthcare services in Canada. Papers published in English will be searched using electronic databases, including MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, Global Health, the Bibliography of Indigenous Peoples in North America and Web of Science. A comprehensive list of non-indexed and grey literature will also be searched to ensure the inclusion of community-based and non-peer-reviewed evidence. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria will be assessed for methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Quality Appraisal Tool. The review will involve the extraction of findings, categorisation into themes and synthesis into broader insights guided by the JBI meta-aggregation approach. An Indigenous advisory committee will guide the process, including interpretation of findings and ensuring alignment with Indigenous health research principles. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this study as it is based on a secondary analysis of publicly available primary studies. The completed review will be published in a peer-reviewed manuscript. Findings will also be shared with relevant Indigenous organisations and community partners through plain-language summaries and community-engaged knowledge-sharing activities. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420250656486.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.