Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41577700›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Improving polygenic score prediction for underrepresented groups through transfer learning.

Hao Wu, Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez, Michael Boehnke, Yuehua Cui, Xiaoyu Liang, Ana I Vazquez, Gustavo de Los Campos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Polygenic risk score translation across diverse populations.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hao WuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7570-190X
Paulino Pérez-RodríguezColegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo, Estado de México, México.ORCID 0000-0002-3202-1784
Michael BoehnkeDepartment of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6442-7754
Yuehua CuiDepartment of Statistics and Probability, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8099-1753
Xiaoyu LiangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Ana I VazquezDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6618-7486
Gustavo de Los CamposDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. gustavoc@msu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5692-7129

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 2035472United States Department of Agriculture | National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) 2023-70412-41054U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) HG013794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of large biobanks has substantially increased the accuracy of polygenic scores (PGS). However, most existing PGSs were derived from European-ancestry data and often exhibit reduced predictive performance when applied to individuals of non-European ancestries. Transfer Learning offers a promising strategy to address this limitation by leveraging information learned in one population to improve prediction in another. Here, we introduce GPTL, an R package that implements three Transfer Learning based approaches for developing PGS: (1) gradient descent with early stopping, (2) a penalized regression model that shrinks variant-effect estimates toward prior values, and (3) a Bayesian method with a finite-mixture prior that enables integration of multiple prior sources of information. Using both simulated data and real data from the UK-Biobank and All of Us, we demonstrate that PGS generated with GPTL's Transfer Learning algorithms consistently outperform single-ancestry PGS and, in many settings, match or exceed the performance of multi-ancestry ensemble-based PGS. Our software can be used with either individual genotype-phenotype data or summary statistics from genome-wide association studies.

Indexed as

Multifactorial InheritanceAlgorithmsBayes TheoremGenetic Risk ScoreGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHumansModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrediction AlgorithmsSoftwareTransfer Machine Learning

Identifiers

PMID41577700
PMCPMC12932743

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.