ArticleScientific reports2026
Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus acidophilus enhance growth performance, immunity, cecal microbiota, and vital organs histomorphology in rabbits.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oral Administration of a Probiotic Blend Modulates Immuno-Antioxidant Status, Semen Quality, Cytokines, and Endocrine Profiles in Rabbit Bucks.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Interplay between gut health, immunity, and bone development in broilers: role of feed additives.Poultry science · 2026Review
- Phenotypic, Genomic, and In Vivo Characterization of a Host-Derived Limosilactobacillus fermentum RLF77 with Potential to Prevent Post-weaning Diarrhea in Rabbits.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Probiotics as antioxidant, antistress, and growth-enhancing agents in monogastric animals: a narrative review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to examine how adding two levels of probiotics, Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus acidophilus, to the growing V-line rabbits’ basal diet affects growth performance, carcass parameters, hematology, serum biochemistry, digestibility, cecal microbiota, economic evaluation of the diet, and histological and immunohistochemical features of the intestine, kidneys, liver, and heart. Sixty healthy five-week-old male rabbits were allocated at random to three groups, each with four replicates of five rabbits. The standard basal diet was provided to the three groups, with probiotics added to the second and third groups at 0.25 g/kg and 0.50 g/kg, respectively, for the 56-day experimental period. Probiotic supplementation significantly (P < 0.05) improved growth parameters and the weights of internal organs, while reducing the percentage of abdominal fat. White blood cell counts and other hematological parameters increased significantly (P < 0.05). Rabbits supplemented with 0.25 and 0.50 g/kg of probiotics showed significantly (P < 0.05) higher serum total protein, globulin, albumin, T3, T4, IgM, IgG, IgA and levels, and significantly (P < 0.05) lower triglycerides, ALT, and AST levels compared with the control one. Probiotic supplementation increased (P < 0.05) the digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, crude fiber, nitrogen-free extract, crude protein, and ether extract. It positively influenced beneficial cecal microbiota. Histological data showed increased villus length, crypt depth (CD), and epithelial thickness in the intestines. The kidney’s renal corpuscle and glomeruli diameter, along with CMFs diameter, increased. Liver PAS staining showed a dose-dependent increase. TNF-α expression rose significantly in both the small and large intestines, while synaptophysin increased in the large intestine (LI). Therefore, adding probiotics to the rabbit diet could improve performance, hematology, serum biochemistry, nutrient digestibility, cecal microbiota, and the economic evaluation of the diet, as well as the histological features of the intestine, kidneys, liver, and heart.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.