Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41578117›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2026

The effect of sample type on genetic testing completion in pediatric congenital hearing loss patients.

Brittany Adams, Lauren Lichten, Aaliyah Heyward, Nandini Govil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brittany AdamsWinship Cancer Institute, Emory Healthcare, 6335 Hospital Parkway Ste 109, Johns Creek, GA, 30097, USA.
Lauren LichtenGenetic Counseling Training Program, Emory University School of Medicine, 100 Woodruff Circle, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Aaliyah HeywardGenetics Department, Ochsner Health Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, 70121, USA.
Nandini GovilDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, 2174 N Druid Hills Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA. ngovil@emory.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8266-8626

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congenital pediatric hearing loss can be linked to a genetic cause in about 60% of cases. Genetic testing (GT) for this condition can be complicated by the availability of blood draw services and the patient's amenability to this procedure. The primary objective of this study was to assess whether GT sample collection method influences the percentage of completed tests in pediatric patients with congenital, non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss. This was a retrospective chart review of patients at a tertiary pediatric otolaryngology clinic who had GT ordered through blood draw from May 2022-April 2023 and patients who had GT ordered through buccal swab from June 2023-May 2024. Patients were offered a testing method based on availability at our institution during the time period studied. The primary endpoint was completion of GT. Additional data collected included demographic patient characteristics, average turnaround time for GT completion, and GT results. Each cohort had a GT completion percentage of approximately 93%. Almost twice as many patients had GT ordered via buccal swab (148/227) than blood sample (79/227: p < 0.05). There was no difference in GT results between cohorts. The observed similarities in GT completion of the cohorts in this study suggests that barriers to GT completion may not be the sample type alone, but rather a more complex set of factors that may affect family decision-making.

Indexed as

Genetic testingHearing lossNon-syndromicPediatricSample type

Identifiers

PMID41578117
PMCPMC12830508

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.