ArticleBiology of sex differences2026
Integrative microRNA and transcriptome analysis reveals sex-specific molecular divergence in human bladder cancer.
Article in Biology of sex differences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A plasma derived hypoxia signature predicts benefit from hypoxia-modifying radiotherapy and reveals dynamic humoral immune modulation in bladder cancer.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBladder cancer affects men and women differently: men are diagnosed more frequently, but women often present with advanced disease and have worse survival. The biological mechanisms underlying these disparities remain unclear. This study aimed to identify sex-specific molecular features and regulatory interactions that shape tumor biology and outcomes.
methodsWe performed an integrative multi-omics analysis combining bulk messenger RNA and microRNA expression, survival modeling, and single-cell transcriptomic profiling. Data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas, Gene Expression Omnibus, and the Genome Sequence Archive. Differential expression analyses were conducted separately in tumors and in normal samples to compare males and females. Experimentally validated microRNA-mRNA target pairs were tested for correlation, and survival associations were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox models. Single-cell RNA-seq data were analyzed to assess sex-biased expression across tumor and immune cell populations.
resultsWe identified 48 tumor-specific sex-biased microRNAs and 456 tumor-specific sex-biased genes, the majority located on autosomes rather than sex chromosomes. Correlation analysis revealed 82 experimentally supported, negatively correlated microRNA-mRNA pairs, including 63 discordant pairs with opposite sex-biased expression, suggesting sex-specific regulatory interactions. Several of these features were significantly associated with overall survival in a sex-dependent manner. For example, the male-upregulated microRNA miR-1270 showed repression of the female-biased targets CYP26B1 and FAM180A, both of which were associated with poor survival, highlighting potential prognostic and therapeutic relevance. Single-cell analysis revealed widespread sex-biased expression across epithelial, stromal, and immune cells, with female tumors showing stronger signals in stromal and immune compartments, which may contribute to the more aggressive clinical course observed in females.
conclusionsOur findings indicate that sex disparities in bladder cancer are largely driven by post-transcriptional regulation of autosomal genes, rather than sex chromosome dosage. By linking sex-biased microRNAs, target genes, and patient survival with cell type-specific expression, this study provides new insight into the biological basis of sex differences in bladder cancer. These results underscore the importance of incorporating sex as a critical variable in biomarker development, therapeutic targeting, and clinical trial design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.