ArticleHuman genomics2026
Genetic contribution to severe COVID-19 in adults under 60 years without major comorbidities in the German National Pandemic Cohort Network (NAPKON).
Article in Human genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
47 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have linked common genetic variants to COVID-19 susceptibility and severity, rare high-impact variants may also contribute to phenotypic heterogeneity. Inborn errors of type I interferon immunity (IFN-I-IEIs), including X-linked TLR7 deficiency, account for ~ 2% of critical COVID-19 cases. In this study, we investigated rare potentially deleterious variants in IFN-I-IEI and GWAS-prioritized genes in young, severely affected COVID-19 patients from the German National Pandemic Cohort Network (NAPKON). Genome sequencing was performed on 110 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, including 82 males and 28 females, all under 60 years of age and without relevant pre-existing medical conditions. Rare potentially deleterious variants in TLR7 and 25 additional IFN-I-IEI genes, as well as 23 GWAS risk genes for COVID-19 severity, were analyzed based on allele frequency, predicted functional impact, and inheritance pattern models and subsequently classified based on the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) criteria. Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) were additionally calculated as an exploratory and case-only analysis to assess the contribution of common variant-derived genetic predisposition for severe COVID-19. Consistent with prior findings from other studies in German cohorts, no candidate variants or large deletions were identified in TLR7. However, 7 variants of uncertain significance in IFN-I-IEI genes as well as 13 candidate variants of potential deleterious effect in GWAS risk genes were present in 19 individuals (17.3%). We observed nominally significant differences in PRS distributions, with younger individuals (< 40 years) having higher PRS (p = 0.045) compared to older individuals, and carriers of rare variants having lower PRS compared to non-carriers (p = 0.037). These patterns are consistent with an age-dependent contribution of polygenic risk to severe COVID-19 and a potentially lower polygenic burden among rare-variant carriers, although confirmation in larger well-controlled cohorts will be required. The candidate variants identified in IFN-I-IEI and GWAS risk genes represent targets for further functional studies to clarify their potential contribution to disease risk. These findings highlight the need for future integrative genomic approaches to better understand the joint contribution of common and rare variants to COVID-19 severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.