ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2026
Emergency Department Presentations for Mental Health Crisis: Comparing ED-Only Care With Transfer to a Crisis Stabilisation Unit.
Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers and Facilitators to Caring for People Presenting With Suicidal Distress in Rural Emergency Departments: A Qualitative Study.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
- Emergency Department Presentations for Mental Health Crisis: Comparing ED-Only Care With Transfer to a Crisis Stabilisation Unit.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emergency departments (EDs) are often the first point of contact for individuals experiencing mental health crises; however, they remain unsuitable to cater to the complex needs of mental health patients. As an alternative, Crisis Stabilisation Units (CSUs) are increasingly being implemented to provide a more therapeutic setting for patients to receive specialised emergency mental health care. However, to date, the evaluation of CSUs in comparison to traditional EDs remains limited. This study aims to examine whether there are significant differences between patients who are transferred to the CSU and those treated solely in the ED in terms of patient characteristics, length of stay and re-presentation. Using ED data obtained from the Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, this retrospective study analysed 18 240 mental-health-related presentations made between August 2021 and August 2023. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to examine differences between patients who completed treatment in the ED and those who were transferred to the CSU. Patients who were transferred to the CSU were found to have a shorter length of stay than those who completed treatment in the ED. CSU patients were more likely to walk in and had lower triage ratings, whereas patients treated in the ED were more likely to arrive by ambulance. Re-presentation rates did not significantly differ between those who completed treatment in the ED and those who were transferred to the CSU. This study adds to the limited work on alternative crisis care models by comparing CSU and ED services for emergency mental health presentations. Findings suggest that CSUs may effectively reduce repeat ED presentations, particularly for patients with moderate clinical acuity. However, the complexity of mental health crises extends beyond basic demographic factors, underscoring the need for deeper, multifaceted research to fully understand patient experiences and service effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.