ArticleDrug delivery2026
Introducing personalized patient care in overactive bladder management using the MedRing OAB system for intravaginal oxybutynin administration.
Article in Drug delivery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although numerous drugs have been developed for intravaginal administration, the implementation of personalized intravaginal treatment options is limited. The MedRing overactive bladder (OAB) system is a medical device for intravaginal oxybutynin administration via patient-controlled schedules. The primary aim was to assess the feasibility, tolerability, and safety of intravaginal oxybutynin administration via the MedRing OAB system. Second, the functioning of the MedRing OAB system, user satisfaction and quality of life (QoL) were assessed. Female OAB patients were included to receive the MedRing OAB system. Treatment was divided into three periods with increasing dosing flexibility: 2 mg at three fixed timepoints daily, 2 mg at three patient-defined timepoints daily, and flexible dosing up to 6 mg/day of 1 or 2 mg doses. Feasibility, tolerability, satisfaction, and QoL were assessed via questionnaires, safety via treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), device deficiencies (DDs) and physical examination and functioning via pharmacokinetics and MedRing logs. Thirteen patients were enrolled, of whom three patients discontinued the study prematurely. Most patients reported low user burden, found the system practical and expressed positive opinions. The TEAEs were consistent with known oxybutynin effects and local TEAEs were comparable to other intravaginal devices. Most DDs were synchronization difficulties, which improved after a software update. After 10 minutes, oxybutynin levels were detected in 12 of the 13 patients. This study showed that the MedRing OAB system appears to be a feasible, tolerable and safe alternative intravaginal oxybutynin administration for 28 days in OAB patients, offering a potential alternative to existing treatment options and introducing personalized patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.