ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Responses of skin and salivary microbiome to different environmental exposures.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Forensic microbiology allows identification by microbiome analysis when human DNA analysis is limited. However, microbiome-based approaches have not been widely used in forensic medicine. The spatial and temporal stability of microbial communities in response to environmental exposures represents a serious challenge. This study investigates the dynamics of skin and saliva microbial markers in response to environmental exposure to advance their forensic applicability. We selected 8 characteristic microorganisms (Finegoldia magna, Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum, Cutibacterium acnes for skin; Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Streptococcus oralis, Prevotella melaninogenica for saliva; Achromobacter, Pseudomonas as environmental markers) and developed two multiplex amplification systems for capillary electrophoresis detection. A longitudinal exposure model (0-120 days) under controlled indoor and dry environment was applied to 420 skin and saliva samples from 10 subjects. Saliva samples exhibited significant microbial community shifts between environments (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
41579164What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.