SynthesisEuropean journal of epidemiology2026
Can too much exercise kill you? A systematic review of the risk of a cardiovascular event or death from long term strenuous exercise.
Synthesis in European journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Shear-Calibrated High-Intensity Interval Training to Promote Endothelial Autophagy and Delay Vascular Senescence: A Biomarker-Guided Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A considerable number of studies have highlighted that engaging in physical activity (PA) improves health and reduces risk of mortality. But is there a limit? Some evidence suggests a U-shaped exposure-response in which the protective benefits of strenuous exercise eventually diminish (at some point) and the risk of a cardiovascular event or death increases, thereby questioning a linear association between exercise volume, intensity, and cardiovascular events/mortality. This review evaluates the evidence and critically appraises studies assessing whether strenuous exercise is associated with increased cardiovascular-related events from an epidemiological perspective. After a comprehensive literature search, 1,908 records were identified; 1,068 remained after deduplication. Title/abstract screening excluded 950 records; 66 full texts were assessed; 14 studies were included for critical review. Two independent assessors appraised study quality and risk of bias, focusing on exposure and outcome measurement, confounder control, and whether timeframes and follow-up were adequate to observe associations. Evidence supporting a U-shaped exposure-response was limited. No study achieved the highest quality rating. Common limitations included inconsistent intensity classification, absence of repeated exposure measurement, inconsistencies with outcome measures, insufficient follow-up to capture long-term effects, and incomplete adjustment for key confounders. The current evidence supports the benefits of regular PA, including strenuous activity, with benefits appearing to plateau at very high doses. Further rigorous epidemiological research with repeated exposure measures, standardised outcomes, adequate follow-up, and more robust control for confounding is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.