ReviewSocial science & medicine (1982)2026
Health among sexual and gender minority people affected by armed conflict and forced displacement: Call for a biocultural and minority stress framework.
Review in Social science & medicine (1982), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations are vulnerable to the intersecting challenges of armed conflict and forced displacement (ACFD), yet their unique health needs remain largely overlooked. We synthesize current scholarship on SGM populations affected by ACFD, with a focus on structural, psychosocial, and biological mechanisms that may impact SGM health. SGM populations face compounded risks during ACFD, including social exclusion, targeted violence, and limited access to humanitarian aid. These psychosocial stressors-heightened by social isolation and identity concealment-may be exacerbated by structural inequities, such as exclusion from shelters, healthcare, and legal protections. Chronic exposure to these conditions activates pathways of systemic inflammation, dysregulated immune responses, and metabolic disruption, which may enhance risks for a range of physical and mental health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease, PTSD, and accelerated biological aging. Our narrative review and conceptual synthesis demonstrates a paucity of empirical evidence regarding SGM populations affected by ACFD, for complex reasons which are discussed. Additionally, our review underscores that there is multi-sectoral awareness that further research and research-to-policy initiatives are needed to improve health and access. Drawing from Minority Stress Theory (MST) and biocultural anthropology, we advocate for an integrative conceptual approach that researchers can adopt to examine how structural violence, resource insecurity, and stigma may become biologically embedded, leading to adverse health outcomes in the context of ACFD. This review underscores the need to develop integrated, holistic approaches to study the experiences of SGM populations and promote health equity in and beyond crisis settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.