Evidence mapPaperPMID 41580088Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of nutrition2026

Acute Effects of a High-Fat Meal Enriched with Pomegranate Seed Oil on Postprandial Lipemia and Endothelial Function in Postmenopausal Women: a Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.

Manal M Almoraie, Jeremy Pe Spencer, Carol Wagstaff, Kim G Jackson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06042673 (Impact of Pomegranate Seed Oil on Postprandial Cardiovascular Disease Risk Markers in Postmenopausal Women.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06042673 naunknown statusnot on this map

Impact of Pomegranate Seed Oil on Postprandial Cardiovascular Disease Risk Markers in Postmenopausal Women.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ReadingRan2023 to 2024Enrolled15ConditionsPostmenopausal WomenArmsPomegranate seed oil, Mixed vegetable oil
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manal M AlmoraieHugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition, Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, United Kingdom; Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Human Sciences and Design, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Jeremy Pe SpencerHugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition, Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, United Kingdom.
Carol WagstaffHugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition, Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, United Kingdom.
Kim G JacksonHugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition, Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, United Kingdom; Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research and Institute of Food, Nutrition and Health, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom. Electronic address: k.g.jackson@reading.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostprandial elevation of triacylglycerol (TAG) is associated with endothelial dysfunction and represents an important independent cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor in women. Although daily intakes of pomegranate seed oil (PSO, 80% conjugated α-linolenic acids) reduce fasting lipids, little is known about the acute effects on postprandial CVD risk markers.

objectivesThis study compared the impact of a PSO-rich meal with those of a control meal on postprandial TAG (primary outcome measure), lipids, glucose, insulin, microvascular function, and cell adhesion molecule responses in postmenopausal women.

methodsIn a single-blind, randomized controlled postprandial crossover study, 16 postmenopausal women aged ≤65 y were assigned to consume either a PSO-rich or a control meal on 2 separate occasions, 4 to 6 wk apart. A high-fat mixed meal (50 g fat) was provided at breakfast (0 min), and blood samples collected until 480 min postprandially to assess CVD risk markers. Specific time points were selected for blood pressure (BP) (0, 120, 240, 360 and 480 min) and microvascular reactivity (0, 180, 300, and 420 min). Postprandial data were analyzed using linear mixed models.

resultsCompared with the control meal, the PSO-rich meal significantly reduced the postprandial TAG response but glucose, insulin, apolipoprotein B, and non-esterified fatty acid responses were similar. The AUC and incremental AUC (iAUC) for the postprandial acetylcholine (endothelium-dependent vasodilation) induced reactivity response were greater (P ≤ 0.04), and systolic BP lower after the PSO-rich meal than the control meal. Additionally, the iAUC for the pulse wave velocity and AUC/iAUC for the soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 responses were lower, whereas plasma nitrite concentrations were higher after the PSO-rich than control meal (P ≤ 0.037).

conclusionsA PSO-rich meal significantly reduced the postprandial TAG response and enhanced endothelial function compared with a control meal, suggesting a potential cardioprotective effect in postmenopausal women. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT06042673 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06042673).

Indexed as

Diet, High-FatEndothelium, VascularHyperlipidemiasPlant OilsPomegranatePostmenopauseSeedsBlood GlucoseBlood PressureCross-Over StudiesDietary FatsFemaleHumansInsulinMiddle AgedPostprandial PeriodBlood GlucoseDietary FatsInsulinPlant OilsTriglyceridescell adhesion moleculesmicrovascular reactivitypostprandial lipemiasystolic blood pressuretriacylglycerol

Identifiers

PMID41580088
PMCPMC13014500

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.