Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41580458›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Development and preliminary evaluation of real-time PCR assays for six lactic acid bacteria.

Shao-Ji Li, Biyan Cui, Wenhua Li, Fuqing Lu, Lirong Yuan, Kaidi Luo, Shiting He, Wanqiong Lu, Keqing Xu, Xintong Zhu and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Shao-Ji LiDepartment of Food Quality and Safety, School of Engineering, Guangzhou College of Technology and Business, Guangzhou, China. lsjsenwuingen@hotmail.com.
Biyan CuiCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, China.
Wenhua LiCollege of Food Science and Technology, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, China.
Fuqing LuCollege of Resources and Environment, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, China.
Lirong YuanCollege of Food Science and Technology, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, China.
Kaidi LuoDepartment of Food Quality and Safety, School of Engineering, Guangzhou College of Technology and Business, Guangzhou, China.
Shiting HeDepartment of Food Quality and Safety, School of Engineering, Guangzhou College of Technology and Business, Guangzhou, China.
Wanqiong LuDepartment of Food Quality and Safety, School of Engineering, Guangzhou College of Technology and Business, Guangzhou, China.
Keqing XuDepartment of Food Quality and Safety, School of Engineering, Guangzhou College of Technology and Business, Guangzhou, China.
Xintong ZhuDepartment of Food Quality and Safety, School of Engineering, Guangzhou College of Technology and Business, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoyan SunDepartment of Food Quality and Safety, School of Engineering, Guangzhou College of Technology and Business, Guangzhou, China.
Yuxuan XieDepartment of Food Quality and Safety, School of Engineering, Guangzhou College of Technology and Business, Guangzhou, China.
Lu HanDepartment of Food Quality and Safety, School of Engineering, Guangzhou College of Technology and Business, Guangzhou, China.
Yin ZhengDepartment of Food Quality and Safety, School of Engineering, Guangzhou College of Technology and Business, Guangzhou, China.
Lei QianDepartment of Food Quality and Safety, School of Engineering, Guangzhou College of Technology and Business, Guangzhou, China.
Shiyi OuDepartment of Food Quality and Safety, School of Engineering, Guangzhou College of Technology and Business, Guangzhou, China.
Guangzhi ZhangInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China. zhangguangzhi@caas.cn.
Chunmin YangDepartment of Food Quality and Safety, School of Engineering, Guangzhou College of Technology and Business, Guangzhou, China. hbycm@gzgs.edu.cn.

Funding

Bureau of Science and Technology of Foshan City, China 2420001004679Department of Education of Guangdong Province 2024GCZX011Department of Education of Guangdong Province 2024ZDJS089Guangzhou College of Technology and Business KYYB202431Guangzhou College of Technology and Business SYKC2024042National Natural Science Foundation of China 32502380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study developed new real-time PCR assays for six lactic acid bacteria (LAB): Ligilactobacillus agilis, Limosilactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus johnsonii, Ligilactobacillus salivarius, Pediococcus pentosaceus, and Weissella cibaria for their application in the food industry. For each target bacterium, a novel primer/probe set was designed in a conserved and species-specific genomic region, with proper length (13 ~ 30nt), Tm (probes: 68 ~ 70℃; primers: 58 ~ 60℃), GC content (30 ~ 80%), and amplicon length (50 ~ 150 bp). The Gibbs free energy (ΔG, an indicator for stability of secondary structures) of potential hairpins, self-dimers, and cross-dimers of the primers and probes adhered largely to the recommended values with minor deviations. BLAST analysis verified the conservation and specificity of each target sequence. After establishing the reaction mixture and the thermal procedure, each new assay was preliminarily evaluated in inclusivity, specificity, amplification efficiency, and precision. All tested samples of each target bacterium generated positive results. All tested non-target bacterial samples yielded negative results. Amplification efficiency of each assay, measured using 10-fold serial dilutions of a positive sample, was 95 ~ 100%. Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of each assay generated relative standard deviations (RSDs) < 2%. Collectively, these newly developed assays predictably have high inclusivity, specificity, amplification efficiency, and precision, which need more comprehensive validation before industrial application.

Indexed as

LactobacillalesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersFood MicrobiologySensitivity and SpecificityWeissellaDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersAmplification efficiencyAssayLactic acid bacteriaProbioticReal-time PCRValidation

Identifiers

PMID41580458
PMCPMC12905260

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.