ArticleScientific reports2026
Integrative molecular simulations reveal NeuroAid II mechanisms in ischemic stroke through network pharmacology, molecular dynamics, and pharmacophore modeling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischemic stroke remains a major health challenge with limited treatment options. NeuroAid II (MLC901), a multi-herbal remedy, has shown clinical promise in post-stroke recovery, though its molecular mechanisms are unclear. This study employed an integrative computational approach, including network pharmacology, molecular docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, molecular mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA) free energy calculations, and pharmacophore modeling, to investigate NeuroAid II's neuroprotective mechanisms. Active compounds were screened for drug-likeness and matched to ischemic stroke-related targets via target prediction and protein-protein interaction analysis. Top ligands were docked to key targets, followed by 100 ns MD simulations and binding energy estimation. Network analysis identified MMP2 and SRC as critical targets. Docking and MD results showed baicalin, DCP-sterol, and DMCG formed stable, specific interactions with both proteins. DCP-sterol showed the strongest binding affinity to MMP2 (- 31.06 kcal/mol) and SRC (- 17.10 kcal/mol), outperforming standard inhibitors. DMCG and baicalin also displayed favorable binding to MMP2 (- 12.17 and - 13.54 kcal/mol, respectively) and SRC (- 16.19 and - 10.60 kcal/mol, respectively). Pharmacophore models revealed conserved hydrogen bonding (Ala86 in MMP2; Ala393/Ala296 in SRC) and key hydrophobic features. These findings provide molecular insights into NeuroAid II's multitarget effects and highlight promising lead compounds for further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.