ArticleScientific reports2026
Fecal microbiome predicts treatment response after the initiation of semaglutide or empagliflozin uptake.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Weight Loss: Gut Microenvironment Modulation to Enhance Cardiometabolic Outcomes and Long-Term Adherence During Incretin-Based Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- From diet to hypothalamic dysfunction: Neuroanatomical and hormonal integration of the microbiota-hypothalamus-adipose tissue axis.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
- Review
- The Interplay Between GLP-1-Based Therapies, the Gut Microbiome, and MASLD/MASH in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- The gut microbiota as a potential determinant of response to GLP-1 receptor agonists: a narrative review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The gut microbiome has been shown to be affected by the use of many human-targeted medications, and the interaction can be bidirectional. This has been clearly demonstrated for type 2 diabetes medications that have been in clinical use for several decades. However, the bidirectional effects of novel type 2 diabetes drugs semaglutide, empagliflozin, and the gut microbiome have yet to be clearly described. Considering this, we investigate the effect of semaglutide and empagliflozin initiation on the gut microbiome of type 2 diabetes patients. In addition, we analyze whether the pre-treatment gut microbiome can predict the treatment efficacy. In the study, patients with type 2 diabetes donated gut microbiome fecal samples at four timepoints (Baseline, Month 1, Month 3, Month 12) that were studied using 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing and analysis. Subjects additionally donated plasma and urine samples for quantitative measurement of clinical markers before treatment initiation and at Months 3 and 12. Repeated measures ANOVA paired with paired t-tests were used to analyze the effects of drug initiation on the gut microbiome. Pearson correlation was used to identify microbial features associated with the change in clinical parameters. First, semaglutide and empagliflozin use is associated with changes in the gut microbiome after treatment initiation, but changes in microbial diversity were not detected. Moreover, the baseline gut microbiome predicted changes in glycohemoglobin for semaglutide and empagliflozin users. Based on the results, our findings suggest that semaglutide and empagliflozin impact the gut microbial community during treatment. In addition, the baseline gut microbiome can predict semaglutide treatment effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.