ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2026
Persistent effects of dietary selection and inbreeding on microbiome composition and longevity in Drosophila.
Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDietary environments can shape host-microbe co-evolution by imposing selection pressures that favor host and microbial genotypes with enhanced fitness under specific nutritional conditions. However, the long-term evolutionary dynamics of these interactions after selection pressures are relaxed remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated the microbiome of Drosophila melanogaster populations that underwent long-term experimental evolution under three temporally variable nutritional regimes (constant high sugar, progressively decreasing protein, and fluctuating protein), and compared them to unselected controls. Following inbreeding of evolved populations, we examined how persistent evolutionary effects interact with aging to shape host-microbe relationships and survival.
resultsAll selected regimes exhibited reduced survival relative to controls, indicating lasting physiological costs associated with historical selection and inbreeding. Survival differed among regimes: the deteriorating-protein regime was closest to controls, the fluctuating-protein regime was intermediate, and the high-sugar regime showed the shortest lifespan. Survival effects were sex-specific: relative to control females, those from the fluctuating-protein regime exhibited reduced early-life survival, whereas females from the deteriorating-protein regime experienced lower late-life mortality. Microbiome composition varied with both selection regime and age. Although Firmicutes and Proteobacteria dominated across groups, selected lines showed increased Firmicutes and reduced Proteobacteria, especially early in life, suggesting early-life taxonomic restructuring. The decreasing-protein regime maintained more stable microbial diversity over time, whereas high-sugar and fluctuating-protein diets were associated with progressive microbiome instability with age. Core Acetobacter species (A. aceti, A. oryzifermentans) declined in abundance in selected flies, indicating persistent disruption of microbiome integrity. A random forest model predicted fly age from microbiome composition with 78.8% accuracy, reinforcing links between microbial dynamics and host aging.
conclusionHistorical dietary selection and inbreeding can leave lasting signatures on survival and microbiome composition in Drosophila. Protein restriction promoted late-life longevity and microbial stability, whereas high-sugar and fluctuating diets were associated with early-life effects followed by later-life shifts in dominant taxa. Together, these findings illustrate how nutritional history and its microbial legacies influence lifespan and aging through persistent host-microbe interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.