ArticleBMC nephrology2026
Provider perspectives on self-management of hypertension: a survey of perceptions and clinical pharmacist utilization.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies have shown pharmacist-based interventions improve blood pressure (BP) control in individuals with hypertension. Here, we evaluated provider attitudes towards the utilization of at-home self-monitoring of BP, clinical pharmacist support, and pharmacist-guided medication self-titration in the management of hypertension.
methodsThis was a quality improvement project at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics and the Iowa City VA Health Care System. We conducted an electronic survey to determine the attitudes of providers regarding various strategies in the management of hypertension. We surveyed primary care providers, internal medicine residents, nephrologists, cardiologists, nephrology and cardiology fellows, and nurse practitioners. Continuous data were summarized with medians and interquartile ranges and compared across strata using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Categorical variables were summarized as counts and percentages and compared using Fisher’s exact tests. Analyses were stratified by training status, specialty, and clinical setting. Open-ended comments were analyzed for overarching themes and positive, negative, or neutral sentiment.
resultsOf the 413 surveyed providers, 153 completed the survey, the majority of whom (78%) identified their role as clinicians. We observed high confidence in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension among all surveyed groups. 91% of providers (N = 132) reported that at least once per week or more frequently, their decision to up-titrate BP medications was influenced by a patient’s home BP readings. Nearly half of those surveyed indicated that they had never referred their patients to a clinical pharmacist for BP medication management and a third reported doing so rarely (once or twice a month or less). Respondents, however, agreed that clinical pharmacists could support clinical decision-making for managing BP medications (68%), reduce the burden on providers (68%), and improve the safety of HTN treatment plans (72%).
conclusionsClinical pharmacists are underutilized in clinical practice although providers expressed favorable perception of clinical pharmacists’ roles in the management of hypertension. Considering the evidence that pharmacist-based management of high BP improves BP control, interventions are needed to improve pharmacist utilization in the maagement of hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.