Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41580731›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2026

An online non-radiographic osteoporosis prediction calculator constructed using interpretable machine learning.

Yuqi Zhang, Sijin Li, Peibiao Mai, Qiang Su, Minnan Gao, Kuan Zeng, Chao Tong, Kun Zhang, Hui Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yuqi Zhang *School of Computer Science & Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Sijin Li *Department of Cardiology, Joint Laboratory of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Universities for Nutritional Metabolism and Precise Prevention and Control of Major Chronic Diseases, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Peibiao MaiDepartment of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (Shenzhen Sun Yat-sen Cardiovascular Hospital), Shenzhen, China.
Qiang SuCancer Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Minnan GaoDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Kuan ZengDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Chao TongSchool of Computer Science & Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China. tongchao@buaa.edu.cn.
Kun ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China. zhangk65@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Hui HuangDepartment of Cardiology, Joint Laboratory of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Universities for Nutritional Metabolism and Precise Prevention and Control of Major Chronic Diseases, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China. huangh8@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62176016, 72274127National Natural Science Foundation of China 82330021, 82061160372, 82270771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteoporosis represents a major health challenge in aging populations, yet its diagnosis largely depends on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), which is both costly and radiation-based. This study aimed to develop a practical, non-radiographic prediction model for osteoporosis using interpretable machine learning techniques and to implement it as an accessible online calculator for rapid clinical and community screening.

methodsData were derived from the 2008–2011 waves of the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Individuals with over 30% missing data were excluded, and incomplete variables were imputed via polynomial interpolation (for continuous variables) and mode imputation (for categorical variables). After performing Spearman correlation analysis (p < 0.001) to identify osteoporosis-related features, GradientBoost-RFE and LASSO regression were applied for dimensionality reduction, yielding 15 essential predictors, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), etc. GradientBoost, CatBoost, and XGBoost algorithms were trained to estimate abnormal DXA results and classify bone status. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), specificity (SPE), and accuracy (ACC), with a temporal validation set (the 2008 wave of KNHANES) for testing.

resultsA total of 18,179 participants were included, with 14,747 in the development cohort and 3,432 in the temporal validation set. Among them, 64.6% exhibited normal DXA results. The optimal model achieved an AUC of 0.845 and SPE of 0.897 for identifying abnormal DXA outcomes, and demonstrated an AUC of 0.876 and SPE of 0.909 in temporal validation. For multiclass classification (normal, osteopenia, osteoporosis), the model reached ACC of 0.724 and 0.744, and SPE of 0.803 and 0.819 in the development and validation datasets, respectively.

conclusionWe developed and validated an interpretable machine learning model that accurately predicts osteoporosis risk and DXA abnormalities using readily available demographic, biochemical, and lifestyle data. To facilitate clinical translation, the model has been deployed as an interactive online calculator, enabling non-invasive, rapid osteoporosis risk assessment without radiological testing. This tool may support early identification of high-risk individuals, optimize DXA utilization, and enhance preventive care strategies across diverse healthcare settings.

Indexed as

Cross-sectional studyDual-energy X-ray examinationsMachine learningOsteoporosisPrediction modelSHAP interpretabilityTemporal validation

Identifiers

PMID41580731
PMCPMC12875019

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.