Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41580763›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Generating the evidence base for implementation strategies targeting colorectal cancer screening in the accelerating colorectal cancer screening through implementation science (ACCSIS) research projects.

Prajakta Adsul, Nidhi Kanabar, Aaron Kruse-Diehr, Mark Dignan, Jill M Oliveri, Electra D Paskett, Daniel S Reuland, Renée M Ferrari, Alexis A Moore, Blasé Polite and 16 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Prajakta AdsulDivision of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Preventive Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA. padsul@salud.unm.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2860-4378
Nidhi KanabarCancer Control and Population Sciences Research Program, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Aaron Kruse-DiehrDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.
Mark DignanDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.
Jill M OliveriDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine and Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Electra D PaskettDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine and Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Daniel S ReulandLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Renée M FerrariLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Alexis A MooreLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Blasé PoliteDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Karen KimPenn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Samir GuptaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Sheila F CastañedaDepartment of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1975-0544
Maria Elena MartinezHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health, Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Jennifer HatcherThe University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Jennifer CouryOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Erin S KenzieOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Amanda F PetrikKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA.
Gloria D CoronadoThe University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA.
David LiebovitzDepartment of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jessica BlanchardCenter for Applied Social Research, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9545-5678
Sonja HooverImplenomics, Dover, DE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6205-1212
Kevin EnglishAlbuquerque Area Southwest Tribal Epidemiology Center, Albuquerque Area Indian Health Board, Inc, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8763-7431
Shiraz I MishraDepartments of Pediatrics and Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4783-0939
Melinda M DavisOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3293-5113
Borsika A RabinHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9837-7866

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementing evidence-based interventions for population-level benefit can be challenging in resource-limited primary care settings. Research is needed to identify, specify, and systematically study implementation strategies that address the multilevel, contextual influences on implementation in these settings. This study reviewed and compared the implementation strategies proposed by Research Projects (RPs) funded through the Accelerating Colorectal Cancer Screening through Implementation Science (ACCSIS) initiative. ACCSIS research projects implemented multilevel interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening and follow-up among their local populations.

methodsParticipating AC`CSIS RPs provided structured information about activities proposed to facilitate the implementation of evidence-based interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening, follow-up, and referral across project phases (i.e., exploration, preparation, implementation, sustainment). Three implementation science experts reviewed and matched program data to implementation strategies and domains using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) classification. ACCSIS RP teams then reviewed and validated matched strategies. Analyses examined similarities and differences among implementation strategies used by each RP and tracked across the screening continuum.

resultsSeven ACCSIS RPs participated in this analysis. Collectively, they reported 89 unique activities that matched 68 ERIC implementation strategies (range: 3 to 17 per site). Several similarities were noted across RPs, such as: four RPs developed and distributed educational materials and three used external facilitation as an implementation strategy. Of the nine domains under which the ERIC strategies are classified, most strategies used by the ACCSIS RPs fell under the domain of using evaluative and iterative strategies (e.g., conducting a local need assessment), followed by training and education (e.g., provider education). All RPs used strategies focused on screening and six used strategies to ensure screening follow-up; only one RP used strategies to improve access to treatment. Most strategies were reported in the preparation and implementation phases.

conclusionsSystematically documenting and collating implementation strategies across ACCSIS RPs contributes to the evidence base of how multilevel interventions can be implemented to reduce the burden of colorectal cancer through screening and follow-up. Study findings can be used to guide real-world implementation efforts, including future scale-up and sustainment.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerImplementation ScienceHumansHealthcare settingsImplementation strategies; colorectal cancerScreening

Identifiers

PMID41580763
PMCPMC12896049

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.