ArticleBMC health services research2026
From the rare to the essential: analyzing the needs of physicians and families managing rare diseases.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to identify the social and healthcare needs of patients with rare diseases (RD) and their physicians within a Universal Health Care System. It seeks to provide valuable insights for policymakers, patient organizations, and healthcare professionals while informing about these diseases, raising awareness, and designing strategies to improve access to quality, timely medical care, including therapies and medication at a local and regional level.
methodsTwo semi-structured surveys were conducted between May 2023 and August 2024, targeting family members of patients with RD (N = 64) and physicians (N = 56) in Uruguay. Surveys were self-administered via email or conducted by an interviewer, and were disseminated through healthcare professionals, RD associations, and social media, using "snowball" methodology and word-of-mouth references.
resultsUruguay faces significant deficiencies in access to diagnosis and treatment for rare diseases, leading to a prolonged "diagnostic odyssey" for families and multiple barriers for physicians, ranging from lack of training to limited access to specialized tools. The low reporting rate to the National Registry of Congenital Defects and Rare Diseases and the lack of updates to the Comprehensive Health Care Plan exacerbate inequities in access to diagnosis and treatment. A key finding is inequality in access to whole-exome sequencing (WES), despite its proven effectiveness in reducing diagnostic times and improving accuracy. Its use remains restricted due to high costs and lack of universal coverage, highlighting the need for a national genomic medicine strategy and medical training in molecular diagnosis.
conclusionThe survey results indicate that RDs have a significant physical, emotional, and economic impact on patients and families. The main concerns raised include diagnostic delays, partly due to difficulties accessing specific tests and treatments. The medical community also acknowledges these issues. The healthcare system needs to update its coverage to include genomic diagnostics, improve medical training, strengthen coordination, and ensure equitable treatment access. These results mimic what is seen in other countries in Latin America and the Southern Cone. They call for a comprehensive, formalized framework for diagnosis, treatment, and care of rare diseases at local and regional levels, accounting for family experiences and prioritizing family wellbeing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.