ReviewClinical epigenetics2026
Targeting microbiome-driven epigenetic modifications: a new frontier in breast cancer treatment.
Review in Clinical epigenetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modulation of the response to immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: the role of the microbiota and microbial metabolites in the tumor microenvironment.Gut microbes · 2026Review
- The Influence of Vaginal, Intestinal, and Tumor Tissue Microbiota on Selected Malignant Tumors in Women.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Postbiotics as Emerging Strategy Targeting Obesity- and Aging-Related Breast Cancer-Prospects in Prophylaxis and Therapy.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Combined Effects of Withaferin A and Sodium Butyrate on NF-κB Signaling and Epigenetic Regulation in Breast Cancer Cells.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Host-microbiome interactions in breast cancer progression and treatment response.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among women worldwide, with significant heterogeneity in its development and treatment response. Recent advances in understanding the roles of the microbiome and epigenetic regulation have opened new avenues for addressing the complexities of breast cancer progression and therapeutic resistance. This review explores the intricate relationship between the gut and intratumoral microbiomes and epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs. Specifically, we examine how microbial metabolites, particularly short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), regulate gene expression via epigenetic mechanisms, influencing tumor growth, metastasis, and treatment response. The impact of metabolic diseases, including obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), on breast cancer risk through microbiome-mediated epigenetic changes is also discussed. Furthermore, the review highlights emerging therapeutic strategies that integrate microbiome modulation with epigenetic therapies, including the use of probiotics, dietary interventions, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), as well as DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitors and histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors. These innovative approaches hold promise for overcoming treatment resistance and improving clinical outcomes in breast cancer patients. Future research should focus on elucidating the molecular pathways through which the microbiome influences epigenetic regulation and developing personalized, microbiome-targeted therapies that enhance the efficacy of existing treatments. By targeting both the genetic and epigenetic drivers of breast cancer, microbiome-based interventions represent a novel frontier in the fight against this challenging disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.