ReviewBMC pharmacology & toxicology2026
Drug re-purposing to improve outcomes in the management of prostate cancer - aims, outcome measures and design of current phase III trials.
Review in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prostate cancer remains a major cause of cancer morbidity and mortality and is rising in incidence across the world. Although a succession of randomised controlled trials have improved outcomes across all stages of disease, there remain significant clinical challenges and unmet needs. Repurposed drugs have attracted interest in the treatment of prostate cancer, where a number of agents have been proposed with a range of mechanisms of action suggesting potential benefits. A major advantage of such drugs is the wealth of pre-existing patient safety data typically available, meaning repurposed agents would be expected to have a known and often low toxicity profile and also (as often late in their developmental pathway and hence generic drugs are available) attractive in terms of cost effectiveness. The evidence required for repurposed drugs to become accepted standards of care and enter the treatment formulary however is no less arduous than conventional development pathways, where confirmatory results from randomised phase III trials remain the absolute requirement. Additionally, these efforts are often led by academic trial groups – with challenges then in the steps to licensing that are typically undertaken by industry. To date, despite large scale initiatives, there is a paucity of drugs successfully repurposed in this way. Using examples across the different clinical scenarios we discuss the opportunities and challenges, design and analyses of current phase III trials testing repurposed drugs for the treatment of patients with prostate cancer and highlight where future success may come.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.