Evidence mapPaperPMID 41580831Full record

ReviewBMC pharmacology & toxicology2026

Drug re-purposing to improve outcomes in the management of prostate cancer - aims, outcome measures and design of current phase III trials.

Duncan C Gilbert, Ruth E Langley, Dami Ayadi, Mannab Berhanu, Lakshmi Kowdley Hemanth, Seunghee Kwon, Hossameldin Abdallah, Angela Meade, Noel Clarke, Silke Gillessen and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Duncan C GilbertMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, 90 High Holborn, London, UK. duncan.gilbert@ucl.ac.uk.
Ruth E LangleyMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, 90 High Holborn, London, UK.
Dami AyadiMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, 90 High Holborn, London, UK.
Mannab BerhanuMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, 90 High Holborn, London, UK.
Lakshmi Kowdley HemanthMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, 90 High Holborn, London, UK.
Seunghee KwonMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, 90 High Holborn, London, UK.
Hossameldin AbdallahMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, 90 High Holborn, London, UK.
Angela MeadeMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, 90 High Holborn, London, UK.
Noel ClarkeDivision of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Silke GillessenInstitute of Oncology of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Nicholas JamesThe Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Gauthier BoucheMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, 90 High Holborn, London, UK.
Mahesh ParmarMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, 90 High Holborn, London, UK.
Matthew NankivellMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, 90 High Holborn, London, UK.
Laura MurphyMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, 90 High Holborn, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00004/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer remains a major cause of cancer morbidity and mortality and is rising in incidence across the world. Although a succession of randomised controlled trials have improved outcomes across all stages of disease, there remain significant clinical challenges and unmet needs. Repurposed drugs have attracted interest in the treatment of prostate cancer, where a number of agents have been proposed with a range of mechanisms of action suggesting potential benefits. A major advantage of such drugs is the wealth of pre-existing patient safety data typically available, meaning repurposed agents would be expected to have a known and often low toxicity profile and also (as often late in their developmental pathway and hence generic drugs are available) attractive in terms of cost effectiveness. The evidence required for repurposed drugs to become accepted standards of care and enter the treatment formulary however is no less arduous than conventional development pathways, where confirmatory results from randomised phase III trials remain the absolute requirement. Additionally, these efforts are often led by academic trial groups – with challenges then in the steps to licensing that are typically undertaken by industry. To date, despite large scale initiatives, there is a paucity of drugs successfully repurposed in this way. Using examples across the different clinical scenarios we discuss the opportunities and challenges, design and analyses of current phase III trials testing repurposed drugs for the treatment of patients with prostate cancer and highlight where future success may come.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDrug RepositioningProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleResearch DesignAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID41580831
PMCPMC12910801

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.