ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2026
An adaptive, youth-centred co-design methodology: place-based co-design centring youth and community participation.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addressing the social determinants of youth mental health in Newham and Northern Devon: reflections on co-design and systems change.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Co-design rationales as living documents for reporting the exchange of experiential, professional and scientific perspectives in mental health care innovation.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCo-design approaches are increasingly used in efforts to address complex challenges, such as adolescent mental health. Benefits of these approaches are multifaceted and include strategies that better reflect local perspectives and needs, as well as the potential for improved outcomes for those involved. However, the literature has highlighted challenges and unintended consequences of co-design, such as issues with inclusivity and undue burden being placed on participants. This paper examines the methods used in the ‘Deeper Discovery and Co-design phase’ of Kailo, a place-based research and design initiative aimed at tackling the social determinants of children’s and young people’s (CYP) mental health in their local communities.
methodsOver approximately nine months, a co-design approach was used across two pilot sites. This involved more than 69 workshops and several ad hoc engagements with CYP and other community members. The goal was to explore structural challenges and develop strategies to address CYP mental health and wellbeing in their local context. The co-design work also aimed to bring together community knowledge and expertise, systems mapping and academic evidence.
resultsOver 300 local CYP, community members, professionals and practitioners participated or contributed to Kailo’s Deeper Discovery phase across the two pilot sites, via group sessions, individual feedback or surveys. The study identified key barriers (e.g. logistical constraints, limitations in accessibility of processes and participation, safeguarding and participant wellbeing concerns) and enablers (e.g. flexible and accessible participation, inclusive and adaptive facilitation, and participation and influence) that shaped conditions for implementation. Moreover, it explored the requirements and tensions for methodological implementation whilst maintaining a flexible and adaptive approach, centring CYP needs and voices, and integrating different methods into the co-design process.
conclusionsThe Kailo programme prioritised the contributions of CYP and their communities, aiming to foster inclusive and diverse engagement through a distinctive, adaptive, youth-centred approach. This paper outlines the co-design methodology used to support the development of locally relevant strategies addressing the social determinants of mental health. However, balancing flexibility and adaptability and centring CYP needs, voices and agency, whilst maintaining a focus on broader structural issues, remains a challenge.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.