Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41581072›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026

Assessing kinship detection: single nucleotide polymorphism array density and estimator comparison in white-tailed deer.

Alec J Christensen, Emily K Latch, Michelle Carstensen, Travis Seaborn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alec J ChristensenSchool of Natural Resources, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-8265-9019
Emily K LatchDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53211, United States.
Michelle CarstensenMinnesota Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife Health Program, Forest Lake, MN 55025, United States.
Travis SeabornSchool of Natural Resources, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, United States.

Funding

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Section of WildlifeUnited States Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection ServiceWild Cervid Chronic Wasting Disease Management and Response Activities USDA-APHIS-10028-WSNWRC00-23-0018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays have become increasingly popular due to their affordability, commercial availability, statistical power, and reproducibility. These arrays are being developed commercially for a wide range of species in various density formats. In this study, we evaluated the ability of commercially available medium-density (72,732 SNPs) and high-density SNP (702,183 SNPs) arrays for white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) to accurately identify known genetically related individuals within a wild population. We also assessed the impact of SNP filtering thresholds on relatedness analyses and compared the performance of 4 common relatedness software: KING, COLONY, Sequoia, and COANCESTRY, on these known related pairs. Our analysis revealed that the medium-density array exhibited greater tolerance to filtering and lower sensitivity to bioinformatic pipelines, making it a favorable balance between cost, computational time, and statistical power for analyses such as population structure. Additionally, we found that reducing missing data, specifically by using a subset of 600 loci with no missing data, combined with the relatedness estimator Sequoia (which allows the inclusion of life history data), yielded the most computationally efficient and accurate results. These findings offer valuable insights into the optimal SNP array size, appropriate filtering thresholds, and the most effective genetic relatedness methods for wildlife population studies.

Indexed as

DeerOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsComputational BiologyGenetics, PopulationGenotypeSoftwareOdocoileus virginianusparentagepedigreerelatednessSNP panel

Identifiers

PMID41581072
PMCPMC13042285

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.