ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Machine learning for enzyme catalytic activity: current progress and future horizons.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting Enzyme Turnover Numbers and Enabling Rational Enzyme Evolution.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Response to "Caution: Fundamental data quality issues underlying intelligent prediction of enzyme optimal pH".Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Spray Dried Lysozyme Microspheres: Morphological Evolution and Enzymatic Activity Retention.Pharmaceutical research · 2026Article
- AUKAT: Conditional VAE-Driven Augmentation and Neural Modeling of Enzyme Turnover Numbers.Biomolecules · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Enzyme catalysis, with its advantages in environmental sustainability and efficiency, is gaining traction across diverse industrial applications, such as waste utilization and pharmaceutical biomanufacturing. However, optimizing enzyme catalytic activity remains a significant challenge. To facilitate enzyme mining and engineering, machine learning (ML) models have emerged to predict enzyme substrate specificity, enzyme turnover number, and enzyme catalytic optimum. This review endeavored to assist researchers in effectively utilizing predictive models for enzyme catalytic activity through presenting recent advancements and analyzing different approaches. We also pointed out existing limitations (e.g. dataset imbalance) and offered suggestions on potential enhancements to address them. We identified that the attention mechanism, inclusion of new features such as product information and temperature, and using transfer learning to leverage different datasets were three main useful modeling strategies. Furthermore, we envisaged that accurate predictors of enzyme catalytic activity would potentially transform enzyme and metabolic engineering, and the optimization of biocatalysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.