ArticleThe Journal of small animal practice2026
Clinical management and outcomes for 51 Pugs reportedly diagnosed with protein-losing enteropathy using VetCompass primary care veterinary data.
Article in The Journal of small animal practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo report the clinicopathological findings, treatment and outcomes of Pugs diagnosed with protein-losing enteropathy using VetCompass primary care clinical data in the UK and to determine if referral or any specific treatments for protein-losing enteropathy were associated with outcome. MATERIALS AND
methodsRetrospective VetCompass study of primary care practice records for Pugs with a recorded diagnosis of protein-losing enteropathy. Of the 51 Pugs diagnosed with protein-losing enteropathy between 2017 and 2024 in the UK, clinicopathological results, referral status, treatment and outcome on protein-losing enteropathy were extracted.
resultsTwenty-one of 51 Pugs (41.2%) were referred for protein-losing enteropathy care. Thirty-four (66.7%) were treated with prednisolone, 2 (3.9%) with cyclosporin, 6 (11.8%) with chlorambucil and 14 (27.5%) with clopidogrel. Twenty-two of 51 Pugs (43.1%) died presumed due to their protein-losing enteropathy, with 54.5% of these deaths occurring within 3 months of diagnosis. More Pugs alive at 3 months compared to those that died within 3 months were treated with prednisolone (28/34 alive vs. 5/12 dead; P=.032) and clopidogrel (14/34 alive vs. 0/12 dead; P=.009). There was no difference between referred and non-referred Pugs in their probability of being alive versus those that died due to their protein-losing enteropathy at 3 months (17/34 alive vs. 3/12 dead; P=.183), 1 year (11/24 alive vs. 6/17 dead; P=.539) and 2 years (7/13 alive vs. 8/19 dead; P=.720). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Studies that account for severity of disease are needed to determine if Pugs with protein-losing enteropathy managed completely in primary care have similar outcomes versus referral. Prednisolone and clopidogrel may increase short-term survival; however, prospective studies are needed to confirm this.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.