ArticleInternational wound journal2026
Needling Therapy for Burn Injury and Related Complications: A Scoping Review of Experimental and Clinical Studies.
Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Needling Therapy for Burn Injury and Related Complications: A Scoping Review of Experimental and Clinical Studies.International wound journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Needling therapy may be a novel alternative therapeutic intervention for burn injuries and related complications. This scoping review aimed to comprehensively evaluate the evidence status of needling therapy for burns and their complications. Studies on needling therapy for burns and related complications were retrieved from inception to 1st June 2024. Nine databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CNKI, CiNii, RISS, KISS, DBpia and OASIS) were searched without any language or study-type restrictions. The study design, details of the needling therapy, and results of needling for burn injuries (or related complications) were evaluated. Of the 1475 articles screened, 46 studies (comprising 16 experimental studies, 12 case studies, four observational studies, 13 randomised controlled trials, and one systematic review) were included in the final analysis. Most studies (71.7%) investigated the acute-phase burn wound healing process, while the remaining studies (28.3%) focused on the modulation of burn-related complications. Experimental studies demonstrated that needling therapy activates phases of the wound healing process including the inflammation, proliferation, and remodelling phases and modulates the cholinergic anti-inflammatory response in burn-related acute symptoms. Clinical studies exhibited a significant heterogeneity regarding treatment period, patient population, and needling type across different study designs. Experimental studies have primarily focused on the wound healing process itself, whereas clinical studies have investigated short-term outcomes related to burn complications, with great heterogeneity observed in the methods of needling employed. Further studies are required to strengthen research gaps between experimental and clinical research, with proper treatment and evaluation periods to demonstrate the effectiveness of needling therapy for burns and associated complications. Trial Registration: INPLASY202450102.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.