Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41582138›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Enhancing classification accuracy in medical datasets using a hybrid distance and cluster refinement-based K-means clustering method.

Hussein A A Al-Khamees, Mudatheer M Al-Slivani, Mayameen S Kadhim, Ahmed Dheyaa Radhi, Nor Samsiah Sani, Rusul Mansoor Al-Amri, Fazidah Wahit, Mohd Aliff Afira Sani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hussein A A Al-Khamees *Computer Techniques Engineering Department, College of Engineering and Technology, Al-Mustaqbal University, 51001, Babil, Iraq. Hussein.Alkhamees@uomus.edu.iq.
Mudatheer M Al-Slivani *College of Education for Pure Sciences, Department of Physics, Al-Furqan University, Mosul, Iraq.
Mayameen S Kadhim *Technical Engineering College, Medical Instruments techniques Engineering Department, Al-Bayan University, Baghdad, Iraq.
Ahmed Dheyaa Radhi *College of Pharmacy, University of Al-Ameed, Karbala, PO Box 198, Iraq.
Nor Samsiah Sani *Center for Artifical Intelligence Technology, Faculty of Information Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, 43600, Selangor, Malaysia. norsamsiahsani@ukm.edu.my.
Rusul Mansoor Al-Amri *Department of Information Technology, College of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Kerbala, Kerbala, 56001, Iraq.
Fazidah Wahit *Center for Artifical Intelligence Technology, Faculty of Information Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.
Mohd Aliff Afira Sani *Quality Engineering Research Cluster (QEREC), Universiti Kuala Lumpur, Malaysian Institute of Industrial Technology, Johor , 81750, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning methods, especially the K_Means clustering method, have demonstrated potential in analyzing medical data by facilitating pattern detection. However, the classic K_Means algorithm suffers from two major limitations: (1) its reliance on a single, often suboptimal distance metric (typically Euclidean), and (2) the lack of a mechanism to refine clusters post-assignment, which can lead to poor cohesion and misgrouping. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a novel enhanced K-Means clustering framework with two key innovations: (i) a hybrid distance approach that combines cosine and cityblock (Manhattan) metrics in a tunable weighted manner to better capture the structure of medical data and (ii) an efficient cluster refinement mechanism based on Z-score outlier detection to reassign distant samples and improve cluster quality. First, we evaluate K_Means using five distance metrics-Euclidean, cosine, cityblock, Chebyshev, and Minkowski-on two public medical datasets: Breast Cancer Wisconsin (BCW) and Heart Disease. Then, we introduce the hybrid distance strategy, systematically varying the weight between cosine and cityblock to identify the optimal combination. Following initial clustering, our refinement step identifies data points far from their cluster centroids (using Z-score) and reassigns them to more suitable clusters, significantly enhancing cluster homogeneity and separation. The proposed method is evaluated using multiple metrics: accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, Adjusted Rand Index (ARI), homogeneity, and execution time. Results show substantial improvements over traditional approaches and advanced clustering methods (deep clustering and spectral clustering methods). For the BCW and Heart Disease datasets, the proposed method achieves accuracies of 0.9825 and 0.9000, outperforming Euclidean K-Means (0.8752, 0.8316) and cosine-based K-Means (0.9350, 0.8418). Homogeneity scores also enhance significantly from 0.7721 to 0.8676 (for BCW dataset) and from 0.4335 to 0.5352 (for Heart Disease dataset)-demonstrating the effectiveness of the refinement step. This work presents an original, practical enhancement to K_Means clustering for healthcare applications, offering improved accuracy, interpretability, and robustness through a hybrid distance strategy and a novel refinement mechanism. The results provide deeper insights into unsupervised learning for medical data analysis and support its potential in real-world clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisMachine LearningBreast NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualDatasets as TopicFemaleHeart DiseasesHumansCluster cohesionDistance metricsK_Means clustering methodMachine learningMedical datasets

Identifiers

PMID41582138
PMCPMC12847962

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.