ArticleScientific reports2026
Enhancing classification accuracy in medical datasets using a hybrid distance and cluster refinement-based K-means clustering method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decision tree with randomized grid search-based hyperparameter tuning and optimal feature scaling for diabetes diagnosis.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning methods, especially the K_Means clustering method, have demonstrated potential in analyzing medical data by facilitating pattern detection. However, the classic K_Means algorithm suffers from two major limitations: (1) its reliance on a single, often suboptimal distance metric (typically Euclidean), and (2) the lack of a mechanism to refine clusters post-assignment, which can lead to poor cohesion and misgrouping. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a novel enhanced K-Means clustering framework with two key innovations: (i) a hybrid distance approach that combines cosine and cityblock (Manhattan) metrics in a tunable weighted manner to better capture the structure of medical data and (ii) an efficient cluster refinement mechanism based on Z-score outlier detection to reassign distant samples and improve cluster quality. First, we evaluate K_Means using five distance metrics-Euclidean, cosine, cityblock, Chebyshev, and Minkowski-on two public medical datasets: Breast Cancer Wisconsin (BCW) and Heart Disease. Then, we introduce the hybrid distance strategy, systematically varying the weight between cosine and cityblock to identify the optimal combination. Following initial clustering, our refinement step identifies data points far from their cluster centroids (using Z-score) and reassigns them to more suitable clusters, significantly enhancing cluster homogeneity and separation. The proposed method is evaluated using multiple metrics: accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, Adjusted Rand Index (ARI), homogeneity, and execution time. Results show substantial improvements over traditional approaches and advanced clustering methods (deep clustering and spectral clustering methods). For the BCW and Heart Disease datasets, the proposed method achieves accuracies of 0.9825 and 0.9000, outperforming Euclidean K-Means (0.8752, 0.8316) and cosine-based K-Means (0.9350, 0.8418). Homogeneity scores also enhance significantly from 0.7721 to 0.8676 (for BCW dataset) and from 0.4335 to 0.5352 (for Heart Disease dataset)-demonstrating the effectiveness of the refinement step. This work presents an original, practical enhancement to K_Means clustering for healthcare applications, offering improved accuracy, interpretability, and robustness through a hybrid distance strategy and a novel refinement mechanism. The results provide deeper insights into unsupervised learning for medical data analysis and support its potential in real-world clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.