Evidence mapPaperPMID 41582251Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology2026

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and steatohepatitis-associated hepatocarcinoma preclinical models.

Jack Leslie, Kishore A Krishnamurthy, Indresh K Gopalsamy, Patricia Inacio, Meritxell Huch, Suchira Gallage, Fiona Oakley, Michele Vacca

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. [Precise clinical classification of metabolic associated fatty liver disease].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. A Mouse in vivo Model Mimicking MASH-Related HCC Pathogenesis.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jack Leslie *Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Bioscience Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6443-2396
Kishore A Krishnamurthy *Roger Williams Institute of Liver Studies, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Foundation for Liver Research and King's College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5441-1794
Indresh K GopalsamyM3 Research Center for Malignome, Metabolome and Microbiome, Institute for Interdisciplinary Research on Cancer Metabolism and Chronic Inflammation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Patricia InacioMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics (MPI-CBG), Dresden, Germany.
Meritxell HuchMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics (MPI-CBG), Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1545-5265
Suchira GallageM3 Research Center for Malignome, Metabolome and Microbiome, Institute for Interdisciplinary Research on Cancer Metabolism and Chronic Inflammation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. Suchira.Gallage@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Fiona OakleyNewcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Bioscience Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. fiona.oakley@ncl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8692-1836
Michele VaccaRoger Williams Institute of Liver Studies, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Foundation for Liver Research and King's College Hospital, London, UK. michele.vacca@uniba.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1973-224X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) encompasses liver steatosis and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), which can result in fibrosis and/or cirrhosis and increase the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The latest Clinical Practice Guidelines acknowledge the importance of systemic metabolic dysfunction as a driver of hepatic lipid accumulation and disease progression. To ensure translational relevance of preclinical models, they need to faithfully replicate the key human pathophysiological characteristics of MASLD and its progression to fibrosis and HCC. This Review discusses the strengths and weaknesses of prevalent MASLD and MASH-HCC preclinical models, expanding the discussion to the latest advances in vivo (for example, genetically altered, humanized and large animals) and in vitro (for example, organoids or spheroids, 3D-bioprinted livers, precision-cut liver slices, organs-on-a-chip and decellularized scaffolds). Evidence will be critically re-assessed according to the new MASLD definition, paving a consensus in the field for nomenclature, expected limitations and how to conduct a systematic validation of new models against human-relevant disease outcomes. We also propose a standardized pipeline for preclinical studies in MASLD and MASH-HCC. This Review aims to help researchers make informed decisions when choosing an experimental design that best aligns with the specific requirements of their projects, whilst meaningfully replicating human disease.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularFatty LiverLiver NeoplasmsAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDisease ProgressionHumans

Identifiers

PMID41582251

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.