ArticleScientific reports2026
Effects of workspace wall colors on productivity and emotion via immersive VR and physiological data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although the environmental color of a workspace is recognized as a critical factor influencing the psychological well-being of its occupants, empirical findings remain inconsistent. To bridge this gap and enhance ecological validity, this study utilized Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR) to simulate controlled yet realistic workspace environments. High levels of realism and user involvement in the IVR simulations were validated. This study employed a within-subjects design. Sixty participants of Asian and African descent experienced all four differently colored IVR-simulated workspace environments (red, blue, green, yellow), with the order of experimental conditions balanced using a Latin square design. Productivity was objectively measured using a proofreading task. Emotional state was assessed using subjective reports (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, PANAS) and physiological measures (skin conductance, SC; heart rate, HR; heart rate variability, HRV). The study compared four color conditions and found: (i) productivity was significantly lowest under green condition compared to red, blue, and yellow; (ii) positive affect (PA) was higher in yellow and blue than in red and green conditions, while negative affect (NA) was highest under red condition. However, color condition had no significant effect on physiological indicators. Furthermore, the findings preliminarily suggested a weak but statistically significant negative correlation between productivity and PA in yellow and blue conditions. Though the effects may reflect both hue and luminance influences, this study provides robust evidence that chromatic wall schemes in workspaces can significantly influence occupants’ productivity and emotional states. The research enriches the empirical data in the existing literature and offers new evidence to support related discussions. These findings offer concrete practical implications for designing workspaces that optimize occupant performance and well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.