ReviewInternational journal of dentistry2026
Laser Therapy Versus Conventional Treatments in Oral Leukoplakia: A Systematic Review of Efficacy, Recurrence, and Postoperative Outcomes.
Review in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral leukoplakia (OL) is a potentially malignant disorder characterized by white lesions on the oral mucosa, with a variable risk of progression to oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Its management remains challenging due to the potential for recurrence and malignant transformation. In recent years, laser-based therapies have emerged as promising alternatives to traditional treatments such as surgical excision and cryotherapy. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of various laser technologies, including ablative lasers, fractional lasers, and photodynamic therapy (PDT)-assisted laser treatments, for the management of OL. The review focuses on key clinical outcomes such as lesion regression rates, recurrence reduction, and the incidence of adverse effects. Evidence suggests that laser therapies not only achieve significant lesion regression but also minimize posttreatment discomfort and preserve healthy tissue structure. Among the laser modalities studied, PDT-assisted treatments have shown particular promise in reducing recurrence rates over long-term follow-up. Furthermore, fractional laser-assisted PDT has demonstrated high clinical efficacy with excellent tolerability, suggesting its potential as a front-line treatment option. Despite these encouraging results, further research with larger patient cohorts and longer follow-up periods is necessary to establish standardized treatment protocols. This review supports the adoption of laser-based treatments as effective and minimally invasive options for managing OL while reducing the risk of malignant progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.