ReviewCureus2025
Uterus Cryopreservation From Experimental Models to Clinical Application: A Translational Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review provides a preclinical, hypothesis-generating overview of uterine cryopreservation using animal models, with particular emphasis on large-animal experimental systems. Cryopreservation of solid organs remains one of the most significant challenges in preclinical and translational research, driven by persistent organ shortages, limited ischemia tolerance, and logistical and immunological barriers inherent to current transplantation paradigms. Despite decades of progress in cryobiology, no solid organ has yet been successfully cryopreserved, transplanted, and shown to sustain long-term functional outcomes in humans. In this context, the porcine uterus has gained attention as an experimental model for whole-organ preservation because of its structural and functional complexity combined with its non-vital status, offering an ethically acceptable and physiologically relevant platform for methodological development. This narrative review, informed by a structured literature search, examines experimental studies of uterine cryopreservation in animal models. A comprehensive search identified 43 relevant publications, of which 29 were included based on predefined relevance criteria and qualitative appraisal of methodological reporting quality. The synthesis focuses on cryoprotectant formulations, slow-freezing and vitrification strategies, and investigational rewarming approaches, including nanowarming, with particular attention to the porcine uterus as a preclinical model closely approximating human uterine anatomy and physiology. Available evidence indicates that controlled slow-freezing protocols using permeable cryoprotectants can preserve uterine histological architecture and retain partial post-thaw myometrial contractility under experimental conditions. Functional data derive predominantly from small-animal models and limited porcine uterine studies, while robust organ-level comparisons between slow freezing and vitrification remain unavailable. Although advanced rewarming technologies have demonstrated improved thermal uniformity in non-uterine large-organ models, their application to intact uterine cryopreservation remains investigational. Collectively, current evidence supports uterine cryopreservation, particularly in porcine models, as a preclinical, hypothesis-generating framework for whole-organ preservation research rather than a clinically established strategy. Given the absence of successful clinical transplantation of any cryopreserved solid organ and the lack of reproductive outcome data, findings should be interpreted cautiously. Continued standardized large-animal studies incorporating functional, vascular, and reproductive endpoints are essential to further define this frontier field before uterine organ banking or any clinical application can be responsibly considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.