ArticleCureus2025
Management of Leakage After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Outcome, Treatment Algorithm, and Predictors of Resolution.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), which is increasing in popularity, is associated with certain complications. One of the most dreaded complications following LSG is a leakage from the staple line. Therefore, it is mandatory for surgeons to be alert to the risk factors of leakage and to be familiar with the leakage treatment choices. The aim of this study is to assess the post-LSG leakage rate, predictors of leakage, and present the treatment algorithm and its outcomes. Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent LSG at our institution during the period from 2018 to 2023. The diagnosis and management algorithm of leakage, as well as the outcomes of treatment, were assessed. Results Out of the included 1289 patients, leakage occurred in 14 patients (1.09%). All patients with leakage primarily received supporting treatment. Finally, the leak resolution rate was 92.86% (13/14). Leakage-management complications occurred in four patients (28.57%), all of whom required ICU admission. Regression analysis showed that higher BMI was the only significant predictor of non-resolution after initial treatment (p<0.001), while smoking (p = 0.002) and diabetes mellitus (p = 0.009) were the predictors of leakage occurrence. Conclusion The treatment algorithm used in the current study proved effective in managing post-LSG leakage, despite the occurrence of some complications. Computed tomography (CT) and endoscopy demonstrated a complementary diagnostic role in accurately identifying leaks. Smoking and diabetes mellitus were identified as predictors of leakage occurrence, while higher BMI was significantly associated with non-resolution of leakage after initial treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.