ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
A novel non-invasive diagnostic approach based on urine and blood: a cross-sectional study combining lipoarabinomannan antigen and interferon-gamma release assay for active tuberculosis.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic value of a combined strategy using the urine lipoarabinomannan (LAM) antigen assay and interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) for active tuberculosis (TB), and to explore its potential as a non-invasive, sputum-independent diagnostic method for clinical application. Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional study design was adopted. Initially, 313 valid cases were selected for LAM performance evaluation, subsequently, 142 cases with both valid LAM and IGRA results were further selected from this group for combined test performance analysis. Using comprehensive clinical diagnosis as the reference standard, the diagnostic performance of LAM, IGRA, and two combination strategies (parallel: positive if either LAM or IGRA is positive; serial: positive only if both are positive) was evaluated, and their distribution characteristics in differentiating between tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infection were preliminarily explored. Results: The urine LAM assay demonstrated a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 79% for active TB. Its sensitivity was higher than that of smear microscopy (33%) and culture (56%), and slightly superior to Xpert MTB/RIF (69%) and TB-DNA (65%), although its specificity was lower. IGRA showed high sensitivity (92%) but moderate specificity (59%). The combination of LAM and IGRA significantly improved diagnostic performance: parallel testing achieved a sensitivity of 98%, making it suitable for TB screening and rule-out purposes, while serial testing increased specificity to 91%, supporting the confirmatory diagnosis of active TB. Among patients with NTM infection, the LAM Conclusion: The combination of urine LAM antigen testing and blood-based IGRA optimizes TB diagnosis by simultaneously targeting two distinct dimensions: pathogen-derived antigens and host immune response. The parallel testing improves sensitivity for screening, while the serial testing enhances specificity for confirmatory diagnosis. This strategy offers a non-invasive approach with ease of sample collection, demonstrating particular value in diagnosing challenging cases such as sputum smear-negative pulmonary TB, extrapulmonary TB, and TB in immunocompromised patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.