ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2023
Rescue Stenting for Failed Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Glycoprotein inhibitors as a first line rescue treatment after unsuccessful recanalization of endovascular thrombectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of Stenosis Severity on Outcomes After Rescue Stenting for Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusions: a Real-world Multicenter Analysis.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Blood pressure management in patients receiving rescue stenting after failed endovascular treatment in large vessel occlusion acute ischaemic stroke: a multicentre registry.European stroke journal · 2026Article
- Safety and Efficacy of Intracranial Stenting in Acute Stroke Patients Using a Pharmacological Treatment Protocol Including Low-Dose Intra-arterial Eptifibatide-A Single-center Retrospective Analysis.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Intracranial Stenting During Acute Endovascular Therapy of Stroke: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of the RESISTANT International Registry.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Impact of intraprocedural antiplatelet therapy on stent patency and safety after emergent intracranial stenting in acute ischaemic stroke: insights from the RESISTANT registry.European stroke journal · 2026Article
- Letter to the editor, regarding "Rescue therapy after failed thrombectomy in medium/distal vessel occlusions: A retrospective analysis of an international, multi-center registry" recently published by Anastasiou Aikaterini and colleagues.European stroke journal · 2025Article
- Rescue therapy after failed thrombectomy in medium/distal vessel occlusions: A retrospective analysis of an international, multi-center registry.European stroke journal · 2025Article
- Contemporary Trends in Utilization of Rescue Intracranial Stenting During Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Stroke in the United States.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Platelet inhibition strategies in rescue stenting after failed thrombectomy: a large retrospective multicenter registry.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Article
- Patterns of Care in the Diagnosis and Management of Intracranial Atherosclerosis-Related Large-Vessel Occlusion: The Rescue-LVO Survey.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Endovascular Therapy for Acute Stroke: New Evidence and Indications.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2023Review
- Unmet Needs in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Overcoming Recalcitrant Clots.Cardiology in reviewReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: When mechanical thrombectomy (MT) fails to achieve successful reperfusion, rescue stenting (RS) has proven to be a feasible rescue therapy. However, the available evidence remains underpowered to assess clinical outcomes. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of RS versus routine medical management in patients with failed MT using an aggregated meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic review was performed from inception to July 2022 of all studies using RS after failed MT. Outcomes of interest included a modified Rankin scale score of 0-2 at 90 days, successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b-3) after RS and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. A random-effects meta-analysis between the RS and medical treatment arms was performed to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) for each outcome. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Statistical heterogeneity across studies was assessed with I2 statistics. Results: A total of 12 studies included 1855 participants, 729 in the RS arm and 1126 in the medical treatment arm. The pooled results indicated that RS was associated with a significantly higher proportion of patients with a modified Rankin scale score of 0-2 at 90 days (RS: 41% versus 21%; OR,3.27; [95% CI 2.08-5.16]; I2=64%; moderate-certainty evidence) and a decreased risk of mortality at 90 days (RS: 22.5% versus 33.8%; OR, 0.47; [95% CI 0.32-0.69]; I2=45%; low-certainty evidence), compared with medical treatment after failed MT. The pooled rate of successful reperfusion after RS was 87% (95% CI 82-91; I2=57%; low-certainty evidence). The rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage did not differ between groups (RS: 8.5% versus 11.7%; OR, 0.85; [95% CI 0.59-1.20]; I2=7%; low-certainty evidence). Conclusion: RS is a promising strategy for maximizing recovery in acute stroke patients after first line MT fails to achieve meaningful reperfusion. However, randomized trials using a standardized approach/technique and MT failure definition are warranted to confirm these results.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.