ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Psychological determinants of GenAI adoption for foreign language education: an extended UTAUT2 model and sentiment analysis approach.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in foreign language education is also a paradigm shift; however, psychological factors that affect its adoption are not well understood. While established models such as the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2) describe technology adoption in general, they often fail to capture the unique emotional and cognitive reactions triggered by AI. Methods: This paper thus presents an important construct to explain the special emotional and cognitive reactions triggered by the learning of human-AI collaboration: AI anxiety. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to analyze survey data ( Results: The results indicate that Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, and Social Influence positively affect Behavioral Intention. On the other hand, AI Anxiety and Habit significantly negatively affect Behavioral Intention. Sentiment analysis supported these findings, demonstrating positive public sentiment and anxiety and complexity associated with adopting decision-making. Discussion: The research shows that integrating GenAI into learning is not a functional interaction but a complex psychological interaction. The implications of this research are important for people developing technologically sophisticated yet psychologically attuned AI tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.