ReviewFrontiers in dental medicine2025
A scoping review of diagnostic techniques used for the detection of peri-implantitis around endosseous dental implants.
Review in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Periimplant mucositis and periimplantitis are inflammatory reactions occurring around endosseous dental implants. The objective of this scoping review was to examine diagnostic techniques used to assess periimplantitis in clinical studies on human subjects. Methodology: The research question formulated was "What are the various diagnostic techniques used for detection of periimplantitis in patients who have received endosseous dental implants?" MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and SCOPUS were searched using a combined MeSH-based search strategy for studies published between 2015 to February 2025. Results: A total of 162 unique studies were included. Study designs, publication years, diagnostic domains, and methodological characteristics are summarized. Studies were categorized as belonging to the diagnostic domains of Imaging ( Conclusions: This scoping review identified major diagnostic domains and mapped various diagnostic tools to provide an overview of contemporary diagnostic approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.