ArticleOphthalmology science2026
Standardization of Imaging Criteria for Detecting Macular Fibrosis in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Subretinal to Intraretinal Fluid in Type 1 Macular Neovascularization: A Clinicopathologic Disease Transition Model.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate conventional imaging modalities for detecting fibrosis in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and to develop a standardized diagnostic workflow. Design: Systematic discussion and grading exercise assessing multiple imaging modalities. Participants: Retina specialists from the International Fibrosis Consensus workgroup and members of the International Retinal Imaging Society. Methods: An international panel assessed the advantages and limitations of 5 imaging modalities-color fundus photography (CFP), fluorescein angiography (FA), spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT), near-infrared reflectance, and fundus autofluorescence-for detecting fibrosis in nAMD. A structured debate was followed by 2 online, masked image grading surveys. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy of each modality, alone and in combination, were determined. Intergrader agreement was calculated. Imaging features were also correlated with histology in a nonhuman primate laser model. Based on consensus discussions at 2 in-person meetings and survey results, a 2-step diagnostic approach using SD-OCT as the primary modality was proposed. Main Outcome Measures: Recommendation for a standardized approach for diagnosing fibrosis in eyes with nAMD. Results: Among the 5 modalities, SD-OCT was considered essential by all workgroup members. Hyperreflective material on OCT was unanimously identified as a key indicator of fibrosis. However, its limited specificity was acknowledged. In 2 masked grading exercises, SD-OCT showed the highest sensitivity (0.88 and 0.84) but only moderate specificity (0.56 and 0.57). The area under the curve (AUC) for SD-OCT was 0.72 and 0.70. A 2-step strategy combining SD-OCT with CFP or FA improved diagnostic accuracy. Hyperreflective material was defined as material with reflectivity equal to or greater than normal retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), well-defined margins, RPE disruption, and a laminated appearance. Corresponding CFP findings included well-defined yellow/white/gray subretinal lesions, and FA findings included early blocked fluorescence and late staining. This 2-step approach increased AUC to 0.85, with sensitivity of 0.83 and specificity of 0.87. Conclusions: The study establishes a 2-step approach using OCT as the primary modality in clinical studies for the detection of fibrosis. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.