ArticleOphthalmology science2026
A Phase I Randomized Trial of Topical Insulin for Glaucoma: Safety and Efficacy Outcomes.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07619482 (A Phase 1/2 Dose Escalation Followed by a Masked, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate Topical Insulin for Neuroprotection in Open Angle Glaucoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 1/2 Dose Escalation Followed by a Masked, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate Topical Insulin for Neuroprotection in Open Angle Glaucoma
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Re: Saludares et al: A Phase I Randomized Trial of Topical Insulin for Glaucoma: Safety and Efficacy Outcomes (Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Microglial regulation of synaptic plasticity in transsynaptic degeneration of glaucoma.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Prospects for Neuroprotective Therapies in Glaucoma: Drug Targets and Emerging Clinical Strategies.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Insulin is neuroprotective in mouse and nonhuman primate models of glaucoma. Here we evaluate the safety and efficacy of topical insulin in human patients with glaucoma. Methods: This prospective study of once-daily topical insulin for glaucoma was conducted in 2 parts: an open-label dose escalation phase evaluating low (100 units/mL) and high doses (500 units/mL), followed by a randomized masked trial comparing low- and high-dose topical insulin. The worse-affected eye served as the study eye while the contralateral eye served as a control. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability, monitored by recording adverse events (AEs), intraocular pressure, and serum blood glucose and potassium levels. The secondary endpoints included structural and functional testing including visual acuity, 24-2 Humphrey visual field (HVF), OCT, and macular and peripapillary flavoprotein fluorescence (FPF). Results: Safety and tolerability were favorable for topical insulin at both doses, with no serious AEs. The most frequent AE was transient stinging, resolving almost immediately after application to the study eyes. Blood glucose levels remained consistently stable before and after insulin administration for all groups. In group 3, 5 of 15 study eyes showed an increase of average retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness by ≥5 μm, compared with 0 of 12 fellow eyes from baseline to the 1-month visit ( Conclusions: The application of topical insulin proved safe and well-tolerated among patients with glaucoma. Notably, 1 month of topical insulin led to a significant, reversible increase in RNFL thickness, indicating evidence for pharmacodynamic effect at the retina after topical delivery. These data support study initiation to evaluate topical insulin's neuroprotective or neuroenhancement effects. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.