ReviewStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2024
Current and Future Treatment Options for Cerebral Cavernous Malformations.
Review in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- The effect of Vitamin D and Vitamin D-based therapies on hemorrhage risk in cerebral cavernous malformations: A systematic review.Surgical neurology international · 2026Review
- The effect of statins on the risk of bleeding in cerebral cavernous malformations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical neurology international · 2026Review
- High-throughput differentiation of human blood vessel organoids reveals overlapping and distinct functions of the cerebral cavernous malformation proteins.Angiogenesis · 2025Article
- Co-occurrence of familial cerebral cavernous malformations and tuberculous meningitis.Oxford medical case reports · 2025Article
- Mesenchymal Nonmeningothelial Tumors of the CNS: Evolving Molecular Landscape and Implications for Neuroradiologists.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Review
- Rock inhibitors in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in aging · 2025Review
- Recent novelties in research and management of cerebrospinal cavernous malformations.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are vascular lesions associated with seizures, hemorrhage, and neurologic deficits. The familial form of CCM constitutes ≈20% of cases and presents with multifocal lesions in the brain and spinal cord, whereas the more common sporadic form typically involves a single lesion. Treatments of CCM include surgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery, as well as management of symptoms (eg, seizures). Surgical resection or irradiation of lesions in eloquent areas requires careful consideration because of the potential for morbidity and mortality, and these treatments are not advised for asymptomatic lesions. The purpose of this narrative review is to describe the current state of treatments for CCM, with an emphasis on potential clinically relevant pharmacologic treatments aimed at targeting aberrant molecular signaling associated with CCM. Literature was identified through PubMed using search terms related to treatments of CCMs. In endothelial cells, overactivation of RhoA/Rho-associated kinase contributes to disruption of cell-cell junctions and a shift to a senescence-associated secretory phenotype, which leads to inflammation, migration, and invasiveness of mutant endothelial cells. Specific (NRL-1049) and nonspecific (fasudil, statins) inhibition of Rho-associated kinase has shown effectiveness to reduce lesion burden in mouse models of CCM. A phase 1/2 clinical trial is currently underway to investigate the efficacy of atorvastatin in patients with CCM, and a first-in-human clinical trial to evaluate safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic parameters of NRL-1049 began in 2023. The β-blocker propranolol and the superoxide dismutase mimetic REC-994 have also shown effectiveness in attenuating lesion burden in preclinical studies. Results from a pilot phase 2 clinical trial of propranolol support further investigation in an adequately powered trial, and the safety, pharmacokinetics, and potential efficacy of REC-994 are currently being evaluated in a phase 2 clinical trial. Additional agents have been used solely in preclinical models and require clinical evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.