ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2026
Toward zero-calibration MEG brain-computer interfaces based on event-related fields.
Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) offers high spatiotemporal resolution, but its application in practical brain-computer interface (BCI) systems remains limited partially due to the need for user-specific calibration and inter-subject variability. We present a zero-calibration MEG-based BCI based on event-related fields (ERFs) by leveraging spatial filters and deep learning techniques. First, we developed an on-line ERF-based MEG BCI with a visual oddball paradigm, achieving the mean classification accuracy of 94.29% and an information transfer rate (ITR) of 20.47 bits/min. Using the resulting multi-subject dataset, we applied xDAWN spatial filtering and trained a deep convolutional neural network (DeepConvNet) to classify target versus non-target responses. To simulate real-world plug-and-play use, zero-calibration performance was evaluated using a leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) cross-validation approach. The combination of xDAWN and DeepConvNet achieved the average accuracy of 80.32% and ITR of 12.75 bits/min, respectively, demonstrating cross-subject generalization. These results underscore the feasibility of zero-calibration MEG BCIs for more practical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.