ArticleRural mental health2026
Challenges Implementing Youth-Focused Evidence-Based Practices in Rural Areas: A Rapid Ethnographic Study.
Article in Rural mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rural youth face significant mental health challenges, and persistent disparities in access to services exist. Yet, there is limited research on the implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for youth mental health problems in rural community mental health (CMH) centers. This study employed a rapid ethnographic assessment to explore determinants of EBP implementation in a rural CMH agency in the Pacific Northwest. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we conducted semi-structured interviews with 11 clinic staff and completed site visits to understand the unique contextual factors influencing EBP use. Findings revealed complex challenges in rural mental health service delivery. While respondents generally viewed EBPs positively, they highlighted limitations in traditional EBP models when addressing the multifaceted needs of their high-acuity, socioeconomically disadvantaged client population. Reported barriers included staffing shortages, high clinician burnout, limited local resources, and transportation challenges. Respondents reported offering comprehensive services that extended beyond EBPs to address their clients' challenges. The rural context also significantly impacted EBP implementation, characterized by intergenerational trauma, substance use, and limited community resources. By illuminating the challenges of EBP implementation in rural settings, this research provides critical insights for developing more responsive and comprehensive approaches to supporting EBP implementation and improving rural youth mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.