ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2025
Developing a Deep Learning Approach for Automated Body Composition Prediction in Newborns Using Ultrasound Images.
Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A machine learning approach to using ultrasound for body composition and nutritional status assessment in newborns: a pilot study protocol.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Measurements of human body composition such as fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) are critical for studying malnutrition and the effects of nutritional interventions. This study introduces research toward a novel ultrasound scanning protocol combined with a deep learning analysis pipeline for predicting body composition. Methods: We analyzed a clinical dataset of 65 premature infants, consisting of ultrasound images from three anatomical locations (biceps, abdomen, and quadriceps), and ground truth FM and FFM from air displacement plethysmography (ADP). Our investigation focused on determining: 1) the optimal data processing methods for this application; 2) suitable baseline deep learning models for prediction to guide our learning strategy; and 3) the anatomical locations and image regions most predictive of FM and FFM. Results: We demonstrate that: 1) pre-processing techniques such as denoising, median filtering, and data augmentation enhance performance; 2) by employing a modified EfficientNet-B1 architecture, we achieve fully automatic body composition predictions from ultrasound images; 3) images obtained from combinations of biceps and quadriceps, as well as biceps, quadriceps, and abdomen scanning locations, resulted in mean absolute percent error (MAPE) values of 26.1% and 25.32%, respectively. Finally, sensitivity analysis shows that FM and FFM prediction are influenced by different body parts, as well as adipose and muscle tissue thickness. Conclusion: This study represents the first demonstration of deep learning for automated human body composition prediction from ultrasound images and lays a critical foundation for a novel ultrasound scanning and interpretation protocol to assess malnutrition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.