ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Analysis of factors associated with 1-year rebleeding in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding and a Glasgow- Blatchford Score ≥ 6 based on serological indicators.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transcatheter arterial embolization with N-butyl cyanoacrylate versus gelatin sponge particles for gastric cancer-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a comparison of efficacy and safety.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Analysis of serological indicators for recurrent bleeding within 1 year in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and a Glasgow-Blatchford Score (GBS) ≥ 6, identification of independent risk factors, and development of a risk prediction model for recurrent bleeding within 1 year. Methods: This study enrolled 575 patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding and a GBS score ≥ 6. Feature selection was performed using Lasso regression to identify statistically significant variables. The cohort was then randomly split into a training set ( Results: A new model was developed based on heart rate, blood pressure, hemoglobin, history of peptic ulcer, comorbid liver disease, albumin, platelet count, and CRP. The model achieved an AUC of 0.938 (95% CI: 0.915-0.961) in the training cohort, substantially higher than the AUCs for the GBS (0.590) and AIMS65 (0.562) scores. In the validation cohort, the model maintained an AUC of 0.940, compared to 0.612 for GBS and 0.637 for AIMS65. Superior performance was further evidenced by decision and calibration curve analyses, which indicated advantages in predictive accuracy, calibration, and net clinical benefit over the two conventional scores. Conclusion: The model exhibits robust performance in the prediction of 1-year rebleeding among patients scoring GBS ≥ 6, underscoring its potential clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.