Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41586005›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in sports and active living2025

Influence of physical activity on perceived stress and mental health in university students: a systematic review.

Alexandra Martín-Rodríguez, Natalia González-Prieto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexandra Martín-RodríguezFaculty of Health Sciences, UNIE University, Madrid, Spain.
Natalia González-PrietoFaculty of Medicine, Health and Sports, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

University students are a population particularly vulnerable to stress, anxiety, and reduced wellbeing. Physical activity has been proposed as a protective factor, but existing findings are heterogeneous. This systematic review examined the relationship between physical activity and mental health in university students, focusing on perceived stress, anxiety, depression, and psychological wellbeing. It was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, and the study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251179614). A total of 38 studies published between 2020 and 2025 were analyzed, involving more than 20,000 participants from various countries. Most studies were cross-sectional, although some longitudinal and quasi-experimental studies were also included. The results showed a consistent association between higher levels of physical activity and lower levels of stress, depression, and anxiety, as well as an increase in subjective wellbeing. In addition, mediators such as sleep quality and resilience, and moderators such as gender or internet use, were identified. The effects were more significant when physical activity was combined with other healthy habits such as good sleep and low sedentary behavior. Although most of the studies were not experimental, the evidence suggested a possible beneficial causal effect of exercise. The need for comprehensive interventions in universities was highlighted, promoting physical activity as a preventive and therapeutic strategy to improve the mental health of students.

Indexed as

active lifestyleCOVID-19 lockdownemotional wellbeingmental health outcomesphysical inactivitypsychological distresssedentary behavioruniversity population

Identifiers

PMID41586005
PMCPMC12827587

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.