ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025
Evaluation of the Fracture Behavior of Severely Damaged Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth with Different Core Systems.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the fracture behavior of severely damaged anterior endodontically treated teeth with a core buildup and polyethylene ribbon fiber in different orientations. Material and Methods: Forty human maxillary incisors that had been endodontically treated were prepared to receive a core buildup and divided into 4 groups (n=10): glass fiber post, polyethylene ribbon fiber inserted horizontally, polyethylene ribbon fiber inserted vertically, and core only. The cores were made with short fiber resin composite. The teeth were statically loaded on the palatal surface until fracture, and the failure mode was classified. The mean values of the groups were analyzed by using the Shapiro-Wilk test and 1-way analysis of variance (=.05). Results: The highest fracture loads were observed in the polyethylene ribbon groups: vertical insertion (677.6 ± 2.4 N) and horizontal insertion (657.1 ± 2.2 N). These were followed by the glass fiber post (421.5 ± 2.2 N) and the core-only group (246.3 ± 4.0 N). The polyethylene ribbon fiber groups were statistically similar (p>0.05). The greatest mean maximum strain, stress, and fracture strength were obtained by the core buildup with polyethylene ribbon fiber inserted horizontally. No significant difference in the fracture strength and maximum stress was found among the glass fiber post, core only, and polyethylene ribbon fiber groups inserted vertically groups (p>0.05). The ratio of catastrophic to non-catastrophic failure was similar for the polyethylene ribbon fiber groups (both 50% - 50%) and for the glass-fiber post (60% - 40%) and core only (70% - 30%). Conclusions: Cores made with short fiber resin composite with polyethylene ribbon fiber inserted vertically or horizontally can be used as an alternative to conventional post systems.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.