ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2026
Building antimicrobial stewardship capacity through participatory health literacy workshops in Zimbabwe.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a mounting sustainability challenge to healthcare systems, especially in Southern African settings, where antimicrobial stewardship capacity is limited by resource constraints, with structural challenges exacerbating the problem of resistance. Strengthening education could support the development of AMR-related knowledge, and stewardship skills for health practitioners are key to enhancing antimicrobial use and addressing AMR. This paper investigates how participatory research workshops can support the development of AMR-related health literacy among Zimbabwean health practitioners (doctors, nurses and pharmacists) and how such literacy can promote antimicrobial stewardship. Methods: Eight interdisciplinary workshops involving 25 health practitioners were conducted at two teaching hospitals in Harare, Zimbabwe. Workshop transcripts were analysed using a combination of a value-creation framework and health literacy. The analysis identified how workshops created immediate, applied and transformative values, supporting stewardship. Results: The workshops created, based on self-reporting from participants, values enabling practitioners' development of AMR-related health literacy. Functional literacy could strengthen prescribing practices and patient adherence to treatment. Interactive literacy may improve interdisciplinary collaboration. Critical literacy have the potential to support the identification of drivers of AMR in resource-limited contexts in Southern Africa. Conclusions: Created values and AMR-related health literacy may support antimicrobial stewardship, with workshops providing a context-relevant approach to enhance AMS capacity in Southern African healthcare settings. This educational approach has the potential to contribute to bridging the gap between awareness and stewardship practice. Through integration into professional training, it could support the promotion of sustainable antimicrobial use in Southern African contexts.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.