Evidence mapPaperPMID 41586240Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2025

How can we sustainably assess the shelf life of EVOO? A systematic review on analytical strategies and food waste reduction.

Monica Di Maria, Diego Planeta, Francesca Venturini, Federica Torregrossa, Pasquale Crupi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Monica Di MariaDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Diego PlanetaDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Francesca VenturiniSchool of Engineering, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Federica TorregrossaDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Pasquale CrupiDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, olive oil quality is assessed through a combination of physicochemical parameters and sensory evaluation performed by trained tasting panels. The International Olive Council (IOC) and Codex Alimentarius define the legal limits and reference values for these parameters. The current analytical methods used to characterize extra virgin olive oil (EVOO), are based on destructive chemical techniques that are time-consuming, require long sample preparation (highly skilled operators), resource-intensive and involve the use of toxic solvents, with marked environmental impact and costs representing an obstacle in the green transition. Additionally, many of them do not allow for real-time analysis or analysis in line with industrial processes. Furthermore, none of the currently established methods adequately address the qualitative deterioration of virgin olive during storage. Thus, quality evaluation should include not only regulatory criteria but also parameters related to human health, the formation of degradation products, especially with respect to storage conditions. In addition, attention should be focused particularly on the concept of secondary shelf-life, with the aim of reducing food waste of olive oil while characteristics still remain unaltered. In light of this, it is necessary to explore alternative analytical strategies that are rapid, non-destructive, and sustainable, capable of guaranteeing the quality and safety of EVOO, reducing food waste, and respecting the principles of environmental sustainability. This review aims to critically analyze the latest analytical methodologies applied to determine the shelf life of EVOO, with a particular focus on their potential contribution to reducing waste and aligning with the objectives of Agenda 2030.

Indexed as

food waste reductionnon-invasive methodsprimary shelf-lifequalitysecondary shelf-lifesustainable analysisvirgin olive oil

Identifiers

PMID41586240
PMCPMC12823476

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.