ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
Patient Benefits in the Context of Sepsis-Related AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementing AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Toward resilient and efficient pediatric critical care provision amid falling birth rates.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Global digitalization continues to advance, extending its influence into medicine and health care systems worldwide. In recent years, substantial advancements have been made in the research and development of artificial intelligence (AI), raising questions about its potential in medicine. The integration and application of AI in intensive care medicine, particularly in sepsis treatment, presents significant potential for advancing patient outcomes and enhancing patient-relevant benefits. However, a comprehensive and systematic overview of the full spectrum of patient-relevant benefits associated with AI-based clinical decision support systems (CDSS) remains lacking. Objective: This scoping review aimed to identify and categorize evidence on patient-relevant benefits of AI-based CDSS in sepsis care. Methods: Systematic research was conducted in 4 electronic databases: MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, the ACM Digital Library, and IEEE Xplore. In addition, a comprehensive search on the websites of relevant international organizations, along with a citation search of the included articles, was conducted. Articles were included if they (1) focused on sepsis and (2) described patient-relevant benefits of AI-based CDSS. Articles published between January 1, 2008, and March 2, 2023, were considered for inclusion. Study selection was performed independently by 2 reviewers. The manuscript was drafted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. The analysis of the included articles was conducted using the program MAXQDA (VERBI Software GmbH), with systemization finalized in a consensus workshop. Results: A total of 3368 records were identified across the 4 databases, of which 24 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the scoping review. The additional search on international websites and in reference lists identified 6 more relevant articles, resulting in 30 included studies. Of these, 20 were quantitative, comprising 7 prospective and 13 retrospective designs. In addition, 1 qualitative study, 1 mixed methods study, 6 review articles, and 2 articles from institutional websites were included. Patient-relevant benefits were systematized in six main categories: (1) prediction, (2) earlier treatment and prioritization of high-risk patients, (3) individualized therapy, (4) improved patient outcomes (including improved Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, reduced length of stay, and reduced mortality), (5) general improvements in care, and (6) reduced readmission rate. Conclusions: This scoping review underscores the potential of AI-based CDSS to positively impact patient-relevant benefits, particularly in sepsis care, where they demonstrate considerable promise for improving intensive care. However, the majority of the identified studies rely on retrospective database analyses. Future research should focus on validating these findings through prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.