ArticleScientific reports2026
Validation of a novel genomic biomarker of mesenchymal stem cell scalability and implications of genotype status on cellular senescence phenotypes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ex vivo expansion impairs the regenerative potential of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs), primarily by inducing cellular senescence. Interestingly, populations of BM-MSCs that exhibit resistance to senescence even after prolonged expansion have been reported. However, a reliable strategy to identify these populations is still underway. Previously, the GSTT1 gene has been identified as a biomarker for BM-MSC scalability, but its effects on BM-MSC senescence have not yet been studied. Here, we investigate the role of GSTT1 genotype in BM-MSC senescence and proliferation. First, we categorized six BM-MSC groups into GSTT1 positive and GSTT1 negative groups based on their genotype. Then, we performed long-term in vitro culture and exposed cells to irradiation as senescence models. After that, their proliferative potential, SASP, and the expression of key genes were investigated. The results show that GSTT1 null BM-MSCs have a higher proliferative potential at low passages and exhibit fewer senescent cells in culture when compared to the other genotypes. Additionally, these cells exhibit a lower expression of p21 Waf1, p14ARF and IL-6, and a higher expression of ACTA2 throughout culture. A GSTT1 null genotype can serve as a potential biomarker to identify BM-MSC populations with higher resistance to senescence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.